Industrial experiences from multi-paradigmatic modelling of signal processing

Burden, Håkan; Heldal, Rogardt; Lundqvist, Martin

doi:10.1145/2508443.2508445

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Raising the level of abstractions might seem to be a technical issue but our results enforce how the success of adopting Model-Driven Engineering depends on both organisational and social factors as well as technical [26,54,119]. In the long run Model-Driven Engineering empowers new user groups to become software developers as well as speeding up the development process [28,39].…”

Section: Industrial Practicementioning

confidence: 71%

“…We saw how executable models allowed the independent development of distinct domains [26] while the subsequent transformations caused problems due to both the different paradigms of the source and target languages as well as from organisational perspective [54].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The contributions under Application consist of two publications that report on the possibilities -Industrial Experiences from Multi-Paradigmatic Modelling of Signal Processing [26] …”

Section: Scholarship Of Applicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Executable and Translatable UML -- How Difficult Can it Be?

Burden

Heldal

Siljamaki

2011

2011 18th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Model-Driven Engineering is a paradigm for software engineering where software models are the primary artefacts throughout the software life-cycle. The aim is to define suitable representations and processes that enable precise and efficient specification, development and analysis of software.Our contributions to Model-Driven Engineering are structured according to Boyer's four functions of academic activity -the scholarships of teaching, discovery, application and integration. The scholarships share a systematic approach towards seeking new insights and promoting progressive change. Even if the scholarships have their differences they are compatible so that theory, practice and teaching can strengthen each other.Scholarship of Teaching While teaching Model-Driven Engineering to undergraduate students we introduced two changes to our course. The first change was to introduce a new modelling tool that enabled the execution of software models while the second change was to adapt pair lecturing to encourage the students to actively participate in developing models during lectures.Scholarship of Discovery By using an existing technology for transforming models into source code we translated class diagrams and high-level action languages into natural language texts. The benefit of our approach is that the translations are applicable to a family of models while the texts are reusable across different low-level representations of the same model. Scholarship of ApplicationRaising the level of abstraction through models might seem a technical issue but our collaboration with industry details how the success of adopting Model-Driven Engineering depends on organisational and social factors as well as technical.Scholarship of Integration Building on our insights from the scholarships above and a study at three large companies we show how Model-Driven Engineering empowers new user groups to become software developers but also how engineers can feel isolated due to poor tool support. Our contributions also detail how modelling enables a more agile development process as well as how the validation of models can be facilitated through text generation.The four scholarships allow for different possibilities for insights and explore ModelDriven Engineering from diverse perspectives. As a consequence, we investigate the social, organisational and technological factors of Model-Driven Engineering but also examine the possibilities and challenges of Model-Driven Engineering across disciplines and scholarships.

show abstract

Section: Industrial Practicementioning

confidence: 71%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Executable and Translatable UML -- How Difficult Can it Be?

Burden

Heldal

Siljamaki

2011

2011 18th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This stance is even more important as the literature suggests that students' views have often been ignored. Also, though trust between the team teachers is presumed to be positive, this pedagogical approach lays bare the possibility for student comparisons of teaching styles and subject knowledge (Burden et al, 2012).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is an approach to pedagogy that is extolled for offering learners a multiplicity of explanations for complex concepts and improves teacher development (Liebel et al, 2017). Outcomes of the team-teaching pedagogical approach are attributed to students benefitting from multiple enlightenments/ vantage points to complex concepts (Burden et al, 2012). While this allows students insightful bouncing of ideas, from a teacher's perspective, it provides an opportunity to promote development through mutual reflection.…”

Section: Article Info Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Student appraisals of collaborative team teaching: A quest for student engagement

2023

JALT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Summary of the 6th International Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM'12)

Hardebolle

Syriani

Sprinkle

et al. 2012

Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

At the heart of Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM) is the conviction that modeling "everything" explicitly, at the right level of abstraction and using the most appropriate formalism(s) is the key to success in model driven engineering. Indeed, the model based design of complex systems requires the use of multiple modeling languages to cope with the inherent heterogeneity of such systems, to offer different points of view on all their relevant aspects, to cover the different activities of the design cycle and to allow reasoning at different levels of detail during the design process. However, essential questions need to be answered in this context: those of the coupling, the combination, the composition, the transformation and the integration of models and of modeling formalisms. The aim of the Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling is to provide a forum for both researchers and practitioners to share on the theories, methods and technologies that address the specific set of challenges of the MPM domain. The sixth edition of the Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM'12) was held this year in Innsbruck, Austria, organized as a satellite event of MODELS. In this paper we summarize the results of this year's event.

show abstract

Industrial experiences from multi-paradigmatic modelling of signal processing

Cited by 3 publications

References 21 publications

Executable and Translatable UML -- How Difficult Can it Be?

Executable and Translatable UML -- How Difficult Can it Be?

Student appraisals of collaborative team teaching: A quest for student engagement

Summary of the 6th International Workshop on Multi-Paradigm Modeling (MPM'12)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About