2022
DOI: 10.1145/3494519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry–Academia Research Collaboration and Knowledge Co-creation: Patterns and Anti-patterns

Abstract: Increasing the impact of software engineering research in the software industry and the society at large has long been a concern of high priority for the software engineering community. The problem of two cultures, research conducted in a vacuum (disconnected from the real world), or misaligned time horizons are just some of the many complex challenges standing in the way of successful industry–academia collaborations. This article reports on the experience of research collaboration and knowledge co-creation b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in their research concluded that collaboration between industry and academia can help in the formation of more qualified researchers and to make industry more adequate for technology and to improve processes (19). Found a set of 14 patterns and 14 anti-patterns in terms of industry-academic collaboration to support researchers and industry practitioners in building and running collaborative research projects in software engineering (20). There is a gap between academia and industry in the context of student interpersonal skills is caused by the inability of academics to collaborate with industry in understanding their needs so that academic graduates are unable to meet industry needs (21).…”
Section: Literature Summary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in their research concluded that collaboration between industry and academia can help in the formation of more qualified researchers and to make industry more adequate for technology and to improve processes (19). Found a set of 14 patterns and 14 anti-patterns in terms of industry-academic collaboration to support researchers and industry practitioners in building and running collaborative research projects in software engineering (20). There is a gap between academia and industry in the context of student interpersonal skills is caused by the inability of academics to collaborate with industry in understanding their needs so that academic graduates are unable to meet industry needs (21).…”
Section: Literature Summary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The students directly put their knowledge to the advance of their projects with different handson activities, which is a clear differentiating factor in active learning methodologies. There are numerous success studies in the engineering context, mainly in software engineering, that illustrate the advantages that this type of collaboration (industry-academia) has on students [56][57][58], but also the challenges, in special with the relevance of the projects, the lack or drop of interest, the communication issues, and the monitoring process [59,60] that we have also experienced. Moreover, the industry-academia alliance can enable the development of high-quality personnel and motivate researchers to grow professionally within organizations [61].…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature [19] explains why customers should cooperate with companies to cocreating value, and both parties can benefit from the development, design and promotion of new products. From the dual perspective of value cocreation, the literature [20] summarizes the three stages of innovation bottleneck breakthrough for manufacturing SMEs: innovation bottleneck identification, innovation solution design and innovation bottleneck breakthrough. The literature [21] used Xiaomi as the original data collection object and conducted an exploratory analysis to propose a model of customer participation in brand value creation and five major mechanisms of culture, product, interaction, participation, and communication.…”
Section: Cocreation Of Valuementioning
confidence: 99%