Industry or Academia, Basic or Applied? Career Choices and Earnings Trajectories of Scientists

Abstract

We extend life cycle models of human capital investments by incorporating matching theory to examine the sorting pattern of heterogeneous scientists into different career trajectories. We link differences in physical capital investments and complementarities between basic and applied scientists across industry and academic settings to individual differences in scientist ability and preferences to predict an equilibrium matching of scientists to careers and to their earnings evolution. Our empirical analysis, using the National Science Foundation's Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System database, is consistent with theoretical predictions of (i) sorting by ability into basic versus applied science among academic scientists, but not among industry scientists; and (ii) sorting by higher taste for nonmonetary returns into academia over industry. The evolution of an earnings profile is consistent with these sorting patterns: the earnings trajectories of basic and applied scientists are distinct from each other in academia but are similar in industry. This paper was accepted by Lee Fleming, entrepreneurship and innovation.

Misusing our talent? Overeducation, overskilling and skill underutilisation among Spanish PhD graduates

“…It seems, however, that a certain number of graduates working in private companies (and to some extent in government and other public sector jobs) undertake tasks that are more closely related to management than to R&D. Despite their higher earnings, these graduates feel that their skills are being misusedwhich is reflected in the job satisfaction analysis. This apparent contradiction could be explained by the fact that PhDs' 'high taste for science' is not fulfilled in their jobs (Stern, 2004;Roach and Sauermann, 2010;Agarwal and Ohyama, 2013).…”

Flying the Nest: How the Home Department Shapes Researchers' Career Paths

“…Early studies by Crane (1965Crane ( , 1970, Long (1978) and Long and McGinnis (1985) stressed the influence of department reputational effects on the first academic job, whereas more recent studies focus on sector preferences of PhD students between industry and academia (Roach and Sauermann, 2010;Gemme and Gingras, 2012;Agarwal and Ohyama, 2013;Balsmeier and Pellens, 2014;Lam and de Campos, 2014).…”

Endogenous Matching in University-Industry Collaboration: Theory and Empirical Evidence from the United Kingdom

“…Firms are also concerned with the di¤erences in terms of organizational and institutional structure, and with the existence of the open science culture in academia (Dasgupta and David, 1994). 1 Overall, previous empirical studies have shown that thanks to collaboration …rms obtain better patents, more products, and increased sales (Cockburn and Henderson, 1998 Unfortunately, most of the existing empirical evidence on performance provides average e¤ects, across all partnerships. Recent evidence, however, stresses the importance of the characteristics of the matched partners in assessing collaboration outcomes.…”

“…Research-oriented …rms and star academics, however, might not be willing or able to collaborate with all participants on the other side of the market. Given the costs and bene…ts 1 Academic researchers' individual characteristics and attitudes, as well as local group norms, have also been shown to play a role in the collaboration decision (Louis et al, 1989). Firms' size, absorptive capacity and the adoption of open search strategies are also important factors in the …rms'willingness to collaborate (Mohnen and Hoareau, 2003;Veugelers and Cassiman, 2005;Bercovitz and Feldman, 2007).…”

“…Take …rst a given academic A i that may form a partnership with a given …rm F j . They will develop a collaborative project rather than two non-collaborative ones if 1 …”