Industry Views of Monitoring and Mitigation of Herbicide Resistance

Soteres, John K.; Peterson, Mark A.

doi:10.1614/ws-d-15-00101.1

Cited by 8 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another measure of HR is the area infested with various HR biotypes. This is a much more difficult figure to ascertain . Results from farmer surveys regarding resistance on their farms can be biased depending on the prominence of resistance to certain herbicides in the news, product failures unrelated to resistance, or discussions with neighbors that can lead to farmer perceptions about resistance on their farm that may not be accurate.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is a much more difficult figure to ascertain. 6 Results from farmer surveys regarding resistance on their farms can be biased depending on the prominence of resistance to certain herbicides in the news, product failures unrelated to resistance, or discussions with neighbors that can lead to farmer perceptions about resistance on their farm that may not be accurate. Detailed studies of resistance conducted by researchers that randomly collect seed and run greenhouse screenings are usually done for only one species within a limited geography due to cost.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: a current summary

Peterson¹,

Collavo

Ovejero

et al. 2018

Pest Management Science

263

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Herbicide-resistant weeds have been observed since the early years of synthetic herbicide development in the 1950s and 1960s. Since that time there has been a consistent increase in the number of cases of herbicide resistance and the impact of herbicide-resistant weeds. Although the nature of crop production varies widely around the world, herbicides have become a primary tool for weed control in most areas. Dependence on herbicides continues to increase as global populations migrate away from rural areas to cities and the agricultural labor force declines. This increased use of herbicides and the concurrent selection pressure have resulted in a rise in cases of multiple resistance, leaving some farmers with few or no herbicide options for certain weed infestations. Global population and economic forces drive many farmer choices regarding crop production and weed control. The challenge is how to insert best management practices into the decision-making process while addressing various economic and regulatory needs. This review endeavors to provide a current overview of herbicide resistance challenges in the major crop production areas of the world and discusses some research initiatives designed to address portions of the problem. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: a current summary

Peterson¹,

Collavo

Ovejero

et al. 2018

Pest Management Science

263

192

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, the industry sector has focused its attention on early detection, monitoring, and mitigation of herbicide resistance through the implementation of IWM [64]. However, although many product labels include a paragraph or two on resistance management, and perhaps a paragraph on IWM, the information tends to be general rather than specific and usually recommends adding additional herbicides with different sites of action.…”

Section: The Doomed Marriage Between Integrated Weed Management and Hmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Eco-Evolutionary Imperative: Revisiting Weed Management in the Midst of an Herbicide Resistance Crisis

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Modern weed science is at a crossroads. Born out of advances in chemistry, it has focused on minimizing weed competition with genetically uniform crops and heavy reliance on herbicides. Paradoxically, the success obtained with such an approach and the reluctance to conduct integrated and multidisciplinary research has resulted in unintended, but predictable, consequences, including the selection of herbicide resistant biotypes. Advances in eco-evolutionary biology, a relatively recent discipline that seeks to understand how local population dynamics arise from phenotypic variation resulting from natural selection, habitat distribution, and propagule dispersal across the landscape are transforming our understanding of the processes that regulate agroecosystems. Within this framework, complementary tactics to develop alternative weed management programs include the following: (1) weed scientists must recognize that evolution occurs within crop fields at ecologically-relevant time scales and is rooted in the inherent variation that exists in all populations; (2) weed management should recognize that the probability of a resistant mutant is directly related to the population size; (3) farmers need to acknowledge that herbicide resistance transcends any one farm and should coordinate local practices with regional actions; (4) incentives should be developed and implemented to help the adoption of eco-evolutionary management programs; and (5) risk analysis can help incorporate an eco-evolutionary perspective into integrated weed management programs.

show abstract

“…Field surveys and tests to evaluate the possible resistance to herbicides are important for weed management practices (Norsworthy et al, 2012). Weed monitoring encompasses activities that confirm resistance in geographical areas defined in a single point in time, or over several years (Soteres & Peterson, 2015). In addition, the monitoring can prevent the dispersal of resistant plants and address regional issues, raising awareness of producers in each region and improving weed management (Lopez Ovejero et al, 2017).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sensitivity of Digitaria insularis to herbicides in agricultural areas, in the Brazilian Cerrado biome

Correia

Rampazzo²,

Araújo

et al. 2020

Pesq. agropec. bras.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this work was to evaluate the sensitivity of different populations of Digitaria insularis to the glyphosate, clethodim, and haloxyfop-P-methyl herbicides, in agricultural areas, and to develop infestation maps based on the responses of these populations. One hundred sixty-one populations suspected of being resistant were evaluated and compared to a susceptible population. When plants displayed three to four tillers, the populations were sprayed with glyphosate (1,000 g ha-1 a.e.), clethodim (108 g ha-1 a.i. + 0.5% mineral oil), and haloxyfop-P-methyl (62.35 g ha-1 a.i. + 0.5% mineral oil); plants without herbicide application were used as the control. The plant populations were classified as susceptible, intermediately resistant (with susceptible and resistant plants), or resistant to the tested herbicides. All populations were susceptible to clethodim; 97.5% were susceptible and 2.5% were intermediately resistant to haloxyfop-P-methyl; and 9.9% were susceptible, 21.1% intermediately resistant, and 68.9% resistant to glyphosate. Glyphosate-resistant populations are homogeneously distributed throughout the evaluated regions. There are no cases of D. insularis multiple resistance in the sampled regions; however, cross-resistance to glyphosate and haloxyfop-P-methyl was detected.

show abstract

Industry Views of Monitoring and Mitigation of Herbicide Resistance

Cited by 8 publications

References 50 publications

The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: a current summary

The challenge of herbicide resistance around the world: a current summary

The Eco-Evolutionary Imperative: Revisiting Weed Management in the Midst of an Herbicide Resistance Crisis

Sensitivity of Digitaria insularis to herbicides in agricultural areas, in the Brazilian Cerrado biome

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About