Inefektifitas Pengaturan Presidential Threshold Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum

Mukhtarrija, Muhammad; Handayani, I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi; Riwanto, Agus

doi:10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art7

Cited by 8 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous members of the House of Representatives." [16] The Constitutional Law expert Zainal Arifin Mochtar believes that setting the threshold for presidential candidacy is an effort to concentrate power. The presidential threshold is related to efforts to concentrate power on certain parties, or this is actually part of the oligarchic game.…”

Section: Presidential Threshold Election Of President and Vice Presid...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election from the Perspective of Constitutional Democracy and State of Law

Haruni

2022

KSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesia is a legal state, the state’s administration is based on the Constitution as the highest law. The constitutional rights of every citizen are guaranteed constitutionally in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as the right to run for president and vice president. Candidates for President and Vice President proposed by political parties or coalitions of political parties are constitutionally not regulated. The election law stipulates its requirements as an open law policy. Therefore, by using a normative juridical approach, it is necessary to examine the limits of the Presidential threshold as an open legal policy such as the principles contained in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, namely democracy, human rights, the rule of law, and fair elections. The presidential threshold can be said to be against the principles of constitutional democracy because the constitution does not regulate it. The current election is held simultaneously, namely the legislative and presidential, and vice-presidential elections are held simultaneously. So, the Presidential threshold is no longer needed or should be removed. The results of the vote in the previous election were inappropriately used as the basis for Political Parties to nominate candidates for President and Vice President. Keywords: presidential threshold, presidential election, constitutional democracy, state law

show abstract

Section: Presidential Threshold Election Of President and Vice Presid...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election from the Perspective of Constitutional Democracy and State of Law

Haruni

2022

KSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Bongkar pasang pejabat negara dari level kementerian hinggal level pemerintah daerah, pun dinilai menjadi salah satu anomali dalam mengadirkan transformasi pemerintahan yang lebih berpihak teradap kepentingan publik. Anomali tersebut adalah bagian atas dampak kebijakan presidential threshold (Ansori, 2019;Hamdanny & Mukhtar, 2021;Listyaningsih et al, 2020;Muhammad Saad, 2021;Mukhtarrija et al, 2017). Sejumlah referensi dengan cukup hati-hati menyuguhkan penjelasan terkait threshold, karena memang memiliki varian beragam antara lain adalah electoral threshold, parlimentary threshold dan presidential threshold.…”

Section: Presidential Threshold: Antara Disrupsi Dan Keadilan Demokrasiunclassified

“…Penerapan presidential threshold pertama kali dirumuskan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2003 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, sekarang tidak berlaku lagi. Pada penyelenggaraan pemilu tahun 2019, pengaturan presidential threshold terdapat pada Pasal 222 Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum yang menyatakan bahwa Pasangan calon diusulkan oleh Partai Politik atau Gabungan Partai Politik Peserta Pemilu yang memenuhi persyaratan perolehan kursi paling sedikit 20% dua puluh persen dari jumlah kursi DPR atau memperoleh 25% (dua puluh lima persen) dari suara sah secara nasional pada Pemilu anggota DPR sebelumnya (Mukhtarrija et al, 2017).…”

Section: Presidential Threshold: Antara Disrupsi Dan Keadilan Demokrasiunclassified

“…Padahal, dengan adanya frasa "tetap mendasarkan pada ketentuan UUD 1945", pembentuk undang-undang selain memperhatikan ketentuan Pasal 6A ayat (2) UUD 1945 harus pula memperhatikan ketentuan dalam Pasal 22E ayat (1) dan ayat (2), Pasal 27 ayat (1) Pasal 28D ayat (1), dan ayat (3) UUD 1945 yang menghendaki adanya jaminan hak yang sama kepada setiap partai politik peserta pemilu mengajukan pasangan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Mahkamah Konstitusi seharusnya menempatkan atau lebih memberikan prioritas pada pemenuhan constitutional rights dari partai politik peserta pemilu dibandingkan dengan pemenuhan atas penilaian bahwa format atau constitutional design atau constitutional engineering menghendaki penyederhanaan jumlah partai politik peserta pemilu (Ansori, 2019;Gobel, 2019;Listyaningsih et al, 2020;Muhammad Saad, 2021;Mukhtarrija et al, 2017;Nur Budiman et al, 2022;Ode et al, 2022;Punomo, 2021;Widyana, 2022).…”

Section: Presidential Threshold: Antara Disrupsi Dan Keadilan Demokrasiunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Presidential Threshold: Harapan dan Tantangan Bacalon Presiden 2024

Sumardi¹,

Lutfi²,

Nurdin³

et al. 2022

JGI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper aims to analyze how the government's level of satisfaction has so far been and how the inevitability of prospective leaders who will compete in the 2024 election celebrations for newcomers. The methodology used in this study uses a library research approach, starting with a search for articles using the keywords of government policies in the fields of economics, law, social and democratic and political dynamics ahead of the 2024 elections in the Scopus and Google Scholar the 2015-2022 period and then reviewedbased on four stages, including: 1) Search for articles, 2) Mapping discussion topics, 3). Topic analysis, and 4). Further analysis with the support of credible data that has been published by credible survey institutions. The results of the study and analysis concluded that the hope of bringing in future leaders still reaps pessimism, this happens because in public reading of their satisfaction with the government's performance, in this case the Jokowi-Ma'ruf cabinet, which is already in its third year, is currently considered to have failed to control the government. policy on a number of aspects, especially regarding the fulfillment of public needs, and economic investment, then another challenge is political and democratic disruption, the existence of a presidential threshold will have an impact on the leadership relay which has an oligarchic background and network similar to the political strategy played by elites and political parties. so far. S

show abstract

“…11 President and DPR, in the presidential system, possess a balanced bargaining position since both own a direct legitimacy with a consequence that it would produce a divided government: the legislative institution is dominated by one or more political parties different from the political party holding the executive power. But according to Jose Cheibub, divided government is not something that certainly happens in the presidential 10 Ganjar Prima Anggara, M. Ali Safa'at, Tunggul Anshari. government where one of the reasons is when the elections for the President and for the legislative members are conducted at the same time.…”

Section: Surveymentioning

confidence: 99%

Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election: A Democratic and Constitutional Study

Sulardi¹,

Ramadhan²

2019

Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Indonesian Legal Studies (ICILS 2019)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Presidential Threshold (PT) is a system the legislators have been being held as an instrument in the presidential election system since 2004. Although PT has been stated in the legal product, and justified by the Decision of the Constitution Court, it does not mean that it is a final product. As something that is always moving, it is essential to deconstruct the system. We should really do it when the 2019 General Election was simultaneously carried out. Therefore, the relevance of PT with the concurrent General Election should be re-thought. In this article, the authors would discuss two things, first, the constitutional perspective in recognizing the PT, and also the tract record of its urgency in the formulation of the direct Presidential Election system, second, the democratization aspect in the PT and the 2019 Simultaneous General Election. The research method adopted in this present research was a normative legal research type, studied using two approaches to laws namely conceptual and comparative ones. The data sources used were primary and secondary. Some conclusions are drawn from this research. Firstly, through the constitutional standpoint, the enforcement of the PT instigates a series of the state administrators who infringe upon the souls and spirits residing in the Constitution, and such overruling attitudes are full of certain political interests, as proved by the tract record of the interests in formulating the direct presidential system. Secondly, the implementation of the PT puts aside fundamental values of the democracy, since the regulators easily have disregarded the long journey of the bloody democracy, and have brought about a general election which was unjust and uncompetitive. The solution to the problem the authors try to propose is that the threshold should be removed. The authors recommend the concept "removal" means that such a threshold should be purely erased.

show abstract

Inefektifitas Pengaturan Presidential Threshold Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election from the Perspective of Constitutional Democracy and State of Law

Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election from the Perspective of Constitutional Democracy and State of Law

Presidential Threshold: Harapan dan Tantangan Bacalon Presiden 2024

Presidential Threshold in the Presidential Election: A Democratic and Constitutional Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About