2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2004)130:9(1309)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic Deformation Ratios for Design and Evaluation of Structures: Single-Degree-of-Freedom Bilinear Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
165
1
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
11
165
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases comprehensive Monte Carlo analyses involving numerical integration of the nonlinear equations governing the motion of the hysteretic systems exposed to ensembles of field recorded seismic accelerograms are required (e.g. [4,5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases comprehensive Monte Carlo analyses involving numerical integration of the nonlinear equations governing the motion of the hysteretic systems exposed to ensembles of field recorded seismic accelerograms are required (e.g. [4,5]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method aims on the generation of a multiplication coefficient, the so-called inelastic displacement ratio, which is used to modify the maximum response of the elastic SDOF system (Ruiz-Garcia and Miranda 2003; Chopra and Chintanapakdee 2004;and references reported therein) in an effort to estimate the response of the inelastic system with some pre-yielding period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These motions were selected from the PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center) Strong Motion Database. More details about this database can be found elsewhere (Chopra et al, 2003). These values were used for both horizontal directions of ground motion in the proposed procedure in order to be able to compare its results with those obtained by NL-THA.…”
Section: Ground Motion Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After, the modal pushover analysis undergoes changes by Chopra et al (2004), for which an extension of this analysis was developed under the name (Modified Modal Pushover Analysis, MMPA) that combines the elastic influence of higher modes with inelastic response of the first mode using several combinations such as the Square Roof of the Sum of Squares (SRSS). In this paper, we first present the development of a new method based on ductility demand response spectrum (Benazouz et al, 2012) for the evaluation of seismic demands of MDOF systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%