1983
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ns.33.120183.003033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic Electron Scattering From Nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
98
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental data are expected to be contaminated with inelastic scattering processes corresponding to some excited states (e.g., 2 + , excitation energies are 0.67 MeV, 1.3 MeV and higher), because the momentum resolution of our spectrometer is insufficient for separating these states from the ground state. Theoretical calculations with a distorted wave Born approximation code FOUBES [23,24] using a transition density distribution [22] indicate that below 1.2 fm −1 and at 1.4 fm −1 , the first excited state contributes below 1% and 10% of the ground-state contribution, respectively. These contributions are much smaller than the statistical errors.…”
Section: Momentum [Mev/c]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental data are expected to be contaminated with inelastic scattering processes corresponding to some excited states (e.g., 2 + , excitation energies are 0.67 MeV, 1.3 MeV and higher), because the momentum resolution of our spectrometer is insufficient for separating these states from the ground state. Theoretical calculations with a distorted wave Born approximation code FOUBES [23,24] using a transition density distribution [22] indicate that below 1.2 fm −1 and at 1.4 fm −1 , the first excited state contributes below 1% and 10% of the ground-state contribution, respectively. These contributions are much smaller than the statistical errors.…”
Section: Momentum [Mev/c]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All theoretical calculations in RPA, as in HF, give the same behaviour in the nuclear interior, which indicates a systematic problem of a more fundamental nature (a detailed discussion can be found in refs. [33,34]). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on theoretical calculations [19,20], dashed-line in the figure, the amount of the contribution of the first excited state is evaluated to be less than 1 % of that of the ground state below 1.2 fm −1 , and to reach up to 10 % at 1.4 fm −1 . Those influence is, therefore, much smaller than the statistical errors.…”
Section: Pos(inpc2016)007mentioning
confidence: 99%