2009
DOI: 10.1080/19452820903048878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality, Interactions, and Human Development

Abstract: The Human Development Index, which is multidimensional by construction, is criticized on the ground that it is insensitive to any form of inequality across persons. Inequality in the multidimensional context can take two distinct forms. The first pertains to the spread of the distribution across persons, analogous to unidimensional inequality. The second, in contrast, deals with interactions among dimensions. The second form of inequality is important as dimensional interactions may alter individual-level eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Also note that, when  = 2, the coefficient defined in (8) reduces to the sample bivariate Spearman's footrule − usually denoted as   − given by…”
Section: A Multivariate Version Of Spearman's Footrulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also note that, when  = 2, the coefficient defined in (8) reduces to the sample bivariate Spearman's footrule − usually denoted as   − given by…”
Section: A Multivariate Version Of Spearman's Footrulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This criterion was formalized by Tsui [4] who called it correlation increasing majorization and was further discussed by Bourbignon and Chackravarty [5] who propose a stronger version called correlation increasing switch. The relevance of incorporating dimensional interactions when measuring welfare has also been pointed out by Duclos et al [6], Decancq et al [7] and Seth [8]. In this framework, we face the problem of measuring the dependence between the three dimensions included in the most commonly used index of welfare, namely the HDI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been argued elsewhere, in certain scenarios it might be attractive from an ethical point of view to reward those distributions that are more equally distributed (see Atkinson 1970, Chakravarty 1990). Unfortunately, the arithmetic mean is not inequality sensitive when averaging subgroup-speci…c information into an overall welfare assessment index (see Alkire and Foster 2010, Foster et al 2005, Seth 2009). In order to remedy this problem, these authors suggest using the family of generalized weighted means, which are de…ned as follows:…”
Section: Inequality-sensitive Overall Improvement Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: inequality). This second route is reminiscent of other recent attempts to construct subgroup-consistent, inequality and/or association-sensitive and nationally representative human development indices (see Alkire and Foster 2010, Foster et al 2005, Seth 2009). In this paper, we illustrate di¤erent ways in which both approaches can be operationalized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was not the case, however, in the HHDI category ( Figure 2) as there were more reported cases of death from OAP than IAP. Generally there were higher mortalities due to air pollution in the LHDI countries than the HHDI and MHDI categories, with the worst cases happening in Sierra Leone, Niger, Angola, Burundi, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, Mali, and Burkina Faso, respectively [11,46].…”
Section: Environmental Pollution and Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%