2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertia effects on characterization of dynamic response of brain tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mean flow rate was estimated from the measured data following established theory. 29 The wall shear stress, s, was calculated using the empirical equation, s ¼ 6lQ=wh 2 , where l is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid, Q is the volume flow rate, and w and h are the width and the height of the chamber, respectively. 30 Viscosity was assumed to be 10 -3 Pa s.…”
Section: Flow Chamber and Pressure Servo Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mean flow rate was estimated from the measured data following established theory. 29 The wall shear stress, s, was calculated using the empirical equation, s ¼ 6lQ=wh 2 , where l is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid, Q is the volume flow rate, and w and h are the width and the height of the chamber, respectively. 30 Viscosity was assumed to be 10 -3 Pa s.…”
Section: Flow Chamber and Pressure Servo Pumpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traumatic injury is normally classified as a focal injury that results in cerebral contusions at a specific location or diffuse axonal injury over a widespread area, probably resulting from shear forces. [1][2][3][4] The deformation caused by the shear forces in diffuse TBI is difficult to define because it occurs throughout the brain and is often mixed with secondary injuries resulting from subsequent biochemical and metabolic dysfunction. 5,6 Most TBI patients exhibit mild or minimal observable damage upon the initial shock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models continue to advance in biofidelity by incorporating an increased level of anatomic detail [4], [13], [14], improved representation of the material behavior at various loading rates [15][20], and advanced measures and predictions of injury [8], [21], [22]. Finite element models are commonly used to understand the biomechanics of brain and skull deformation when the head is subjected to insult, leading to improved insight into mechanisms of acute injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies utilizing compression Kolsky bar techniques purportedly removed radial inertia effects by switching from disk-shaped specimens to annular specimens [Chen and Song 2011]. It was later shown that annular specimens are also plagued by radial inertia effects and that the observed increases in axial stress at high strain-rates were falsely attributed to viscoelastic properties of the specimen [Scheidler and Kraft 2010;Sanborn 2011;Sanborn et al 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a variation of the torsional Kolsky bar test has been developed for studying the strain-rate sensitivity of very soft materials and applied to bovine brain tissue [Nie et al 2013;Sanborn et al 2012]. In this modified torsion test, the transmission bar is replaced with a torque load cell in order to generate a stronger signal than could be obtained from strain gage measurements on a transmission bar; see Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%