2016
DOI: 10.1134/s106377101603009x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertial attached neck length of Helmholtz resonators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, let us note that if for a frequency of 400 Hz the error increases smoothly with decreasing n, then for a frequency of 800 Hz these changes are more complex, unsystematic in nature, and large errors are also typical for a higher frequency. In general, this conclusion is consistent with the results of [15], where a more accurate partition was used with a maximum finite element size of 0.01 m. It was found that at frequencies above 4000 Hz, the errors in the calculations become higher. The authors explained this result by the fact that, at the boundaries of the considered computational domain, the impedance boundary conditions did not fully correspond to the conditions of the characteristic impedance of air and this became critical at high frequencies.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of the Noise Barriersupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, let us note that if for a frequency of 400 Hz the error increases smoothly with decreasing n, then for a frequency of 800 Hz these changes are more complex, unsystematic in nature, and large errors are also typical for a higher frequency. In general, this conclusion is consistent with the results of [15], where a more accurate partition was used with a maximum finite element size of 0.01 m. It was found that at frequencies above 4000 Hz, the errors in the calculations become higher. The authors explained this result by the fact that, at the boundaries of the considered computational domain, the impedance boundary conditions did not fully correspond to the conditions of the characteristic impedance of air and this became critical at high frequencies.…”
Section: Finite Element Model Of the Noise Barriersupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Calculation and design of acoustic barriers both in our country and abroad are paid great attention [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Moreover, as a rule, the effectiveness of acoustic barriers is estimated using the Maekawa formula [1][2][3], which is the result of approximating experimental data in which the Fresnel number is the main calculation parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To determine the required parameters, the noise barrier was modeled using finite element modeling in COMSOL Multiphysics. Such an approach in recent times is increasingly used [7][8][9][10][11]. This modeling method allows presenting a discrete space as a finite set of elementary volumes.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Sound Barrier Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that today numerical methods are increasingly used in in calculating mufflers and other areas of applied acoustics [7][8][9][10][11][12]. To analyze the acoustic characteristics of the Herschel-Quincke pipe, a numerical calculation method based on finite element modeling was applied.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%