2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-020-00186-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inexact first-order primal–dual algorithms

Abstract: We investigate the convergence of a recently popular class of first-order primal-dual algorithms for saddle point problems under the presence of errors in the proximal maps and gradients. We study several types of errors and show that, provided a sufficient decay of these errors, the same convergence rates as for the error-free algorithm can be established. More precisely, we prove the (optimal) O(1∕N) convergence to a saddle point in finite dimensions for the class of non-smooth problems considered in this pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…for ω = (1 + θ)/(2 + µ) < 1 (precisely, ω = θ in case θ = 1/(1 + µ), ω = 1/(1 + µ/2) in case θ = 1). Hence, one should expect X k , Y k to converge to the solution of (31) if g, f * and are smooth enough, following the analysis for inexact primal-dual algorithms (see for instance [22]). We can sketch a convergence analysis, following [6,7,22], as follows.…”
Section: A3 Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for ω = (1 + θ)/(2 + µ) < 1 (precisely, ω = θ in case θ = 1/(1 + µ), ω = 1/(1 + µ/2) in case θ = 1). Hence, one should expect X k , Y k to converge to the solution of (31) if g, f * and are smooth enough, following the analysis for inexact primal-dual algorithms (see for instance [22]). We can sketch a convergence analysis, following [6,7,22], as follows.…”
Section: A3 Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sincew (n) approximates the minimum of the proximal function with precision C E n , the calculated w (n) is a so-called type-one approximation of the proximal point w (n) := S τ (w) with precision C E n , see [50, p. 385]. Since the precisions (C E n ) 1 /2 are summable, [50,Thm. 2] guarantees the convergence of the inexact primal-dual method to a saddlepoint (w † , y † ).…”
Section: Remark 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generalizations of [15] involving inexactness already exist in the form of [45] and [14], however, [45] only considers determinstic inexactness and proximal operators computed in the euclidean sense, i.e., with entropy equal to the euclidean energy, and requires Lipschitz-smoothness. It's worth noting that the inexactness considered in their paper allows for the inexact computation of the proximal operators, in contrast to our work.…”
Section: Contribution and Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%