“…To address these issues, we conducted the United States, 6 " 10 but also because numerous challenges a cross-sectional risk assessment study of CHCWs to deto the implementation of standard infection control prac-termine the prevalence of and risk factors for both bloodtices in the correctional setting have been identified. 11 " 14 borne infection exposure and markers for hepatitis B virus Likewise, although risk reduction recommendations to pre-(HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The results vent the transmission of bloodborne pathogens in hospitals can contribute information to infection control practitionhave been promulgated and evaluated, 15 " 17 the degree of im-ers in the correctional setting, as well as others more gen-erally interested in the occupational risk of bloodborne infections for HCWs.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28:24-30mentioning
Although the wide coverage with hepatitis B vaccination and the decreasing rate of hepatitis C virus infection in the general population are encouraging, the high rate of exposure in CHCWs and the lack of exposure documentation are concerns. Continued efforts to develop interventions to reduce exposures and encourage reporting should be implemented and evaluated in correctional healthcare settings. These interventions should address infection control barriers unique to the correctional setting.
“…To address these issues, we conducted the United States, 6 " 10 but also because numerous challenges a cross-sectional risk assessment study of CHCWs to deto the implementation of standard infection control prac-termine the prevalence of and risk factors for both bloodtices in the correctional setting have been identified. 11 " 14 borne infection exposure and markers for hepatitis B virus Likewise, although risk reduction recommendations to pre-(HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The results vent the transmission of bloodborne pathogens in hospitals can contribute information to infection control practitionhave been promulgated and evaluated, 15 " 17 the degree of im-ers in the correctional setting, as well as others more gen-erally interested in the occupational risk of bloodborne infections for HCWs.…”
Section: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28:24-30mentioning
Although the wide coverage with hepatitis B vaccination and the decreasing rate of hepatitis C virus infection in the general population are encouraging, the high rate of exposure in CHCWs and the lack of exposure documentation are concerns. Continued efforts to develop interventions to reduce exposures and encourage reporting should be implemented and evaluated in correctional healthcare settings. These interventions should address infection control barriers unique to the correctional setting.
“…Numerous studies have estimated the occupational risk of exposure and infection with bloodborne pathogens for hospital-based and correctional healthcare workers (category I workers with regular or frequent exposure potential) [ 9 - 14 ], but similar data are sparse for prison officers not employed in healthcare delivery (PONEIHD, Category II workers with intermittent exposure potential). This is a concern not only because of high prevalence rates of bloodborne and sexually transmitted infectious diseases among prison inmates, but also because numerous challenges to the implementation of standard infection control practices in the correctional setting have been identified [ 15 - 17 ]. Additionally, although risk reduction recommendations to prevent the transmission of bloodborne pathogens in hospitals have been promulgated and evaluated, the degree of implementation and effectiveness of similar recommendations targeting correctional facilities remains largely unknown [ 18 ].…”
Background: Prisons are known to be high-risk environments for the spread of bloodborne and sexually transmitted infections. Prison officers are considered to have an intermittent exposure potential to bloodborne infectious diseases on the job, however there has been no studies on the prevalence of these infections in prison officers in Ghana.
“…One large correctional complex in New York City already has an ICP in place (Chisolm, 1988;Johnsen, 1990). Based on the public health model of host, agent, and environment, and guided by an interagency committee made up of prison and health department staff with public health taking the lead role, the ICP incorporates many of the components suggested in Intervention #2.…”
Section: Underpinnings Of the Interventionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Given the environment within which they work, this is a legitimate concern. In addition, inmate unrest increases under conditions of poor health care and fear of infection (Chisolm, 1988). Inmate unrest contributes to prison uprisings in which staff safety may be seriously jeopardized.…”
Section: Description Of Intervention Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as many as 50 percent are released within 48 hours at a large New York City correctional complex (Chisolm, 1988). In the community, high-risk or infected individuals often escape public health outreach efforts (Glaser & Greifinger, 1993;Cohen et al, 1992).…”
Section: Description Of Intervention Componentsmentioning
A two-tiered intervention is proposed to address the high prevalence rate of infectious disease among inmate populations and the communities from which they come. A facilitative climate is created (first tier) within which to implement an infection control program (second tier) geared specifically to the needs of an inmate population and its community. The program is based on collaboration between public health and corrections organizations. Targeted groups and intervention components are outlined. Historical and empirical support for the intervention is explored. Organizational and policy requisites for successful implementation are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.