Infection control knowledge and practice: A cross-sectional survey on dental laboratories in dental institutes of North India

Abstract

Aim and Objectives:The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of dental laboratory technicians regarding infection control and modes of infection control employed by them.Settings and Design:A self-assessment questionnaire-based survey was carried out among dental technicians to assess the knowledge and practice of infection control in dental laboratories.Materials and Methods:Survey instrument containing 16 questions were randomly distributed to 70 dental colleges of North India regarding knowledge of infection control methods and infection control practised in laboratories. Data were collected and analyzed.Results:The response showed that 30.76% of dental technicians receive 30–50 or more than 50 impressions in a week. About 96.15% of the technicians used a plastic bag to carry impressions. Twenty-five percent of the dental technicians were aware of infection control protocol. Fifty-five percent of the technicians received impressions while wearing gloves and 61.53% of the institutes had a separate receiving area. Nearly 71.15% of the technicians communicate with the doctor regarding the disinfection of impression received in the laboratory. Almost 30.76% of the dental technicians disinfect all the impressions and 67.30% technicians use immersion for disinfection of impressions. Only 38.46% responded that they immerse impressions for 10 min for disinfection. About 73.07% use gloves, 90.38% use mouth masks, 57.69% wear eye shields, and 88.46% wear aprons while working. Nearly 78.84% of the technicians received vaccination against hepatitis B virus. Almost 69.23% of the technicians change pumice slurry after regular intervals, and 75% do not add any disinfectant. Nearly 59.61% of technicians disinfect the prostheses before sending it to the clinic, and 42.30% disinfect them by immersion technique. About disposal of waste, 80.76% said that they dispose the waste properly.Conclusion:To summarize, most of the technicians were not aware of basic infection control protocols.

Innovation by Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Technology: A Look at Infection Prevention in Dental Settings

“…More recent findings indicate insufficient knowledge and very limited awareness by dental healthcare personnel (DHCP) in relation to infection control, taking into account the insufficient use of PPEs, low use of sterilized impression tray (13%), rinsing the impressions with water (37.2%) or brushing away debris (2,6%) before disinfection, blood-contaminated impression (25%), improper disinfection of impression (about 40%) or of metallic impression trays, denture prosthesis, bite registration and wax, face bole and fork, and lack of communication (24,7%) with DL about impression disinfection in dental offices [2, 11–13, 39, 42–46].…”

Comparative evaluation of the effect of chemical disinfectants and ultraviolet disinfection on dimensional stability of the polyvinyl siloxane impressions

“…Because of apprehension and distress about the infection control, disinfecting the impressions has become a cardinal issue in clinical practice. [8]…”

General Dentists’ Knowledge About Infection Control of Dental Impressions Between Clinic and Laboratory in South Khorasan Province

“…Although, the students of dental technology who become dental technicians in future, should be educated in this field as well (20). Gupta et al reported that most of the technicians were not aware of basic infection control protocols (21). According to Moradi Khanghahi et al systematic review, the knowledge, attitudes and practice of infection control in Iranian dental settings were found to be inadequate.…”