General Dentists’ Knowledge About Infection Control of Dental Impressions Between Clinic and Laboratory in South Khorasan Province

Mostafavi, Azam Sadat; Moghadam, Gholamhossein Motahhary; Hajiani, Narges

doi:10.5812/zjrms.22031

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In light of the most recent guidelines, disinfection methods are recommended. 10 Due to differing opinions on the best possible disinfection technique, it might be challenging to make an well-informed choice. 11 The most often used disinfectants include chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, alcohol, sodium hypochlorite, and glutaraldehyde.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of propolis on the mechanophysical properties of addition silicon dental impression material

Abdulaali,

Abass

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Dental impressions should be disinfected to stop the transmission of germs among dental workers since they provide a risk of diseases. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of two disinfectants (16 mg/ml propolis and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite) on the detail reproduction, linear dimensional change, compatibility with gypsum products, wettability, and surface roughness of addition silicon material. Methods Ninety specimens were created using Addition silicon impression material, and they were then divided into three groups at random. Ten specimens from each test group were used in each test. Utilizing apparatus made in accordance with ISO 4823:2015, detail reproduction, linear dimensional change, and compatibility with gypsum products are assessed. A digital Profilometer was uutilized to evaluate surface roughness, and a Goniometer was utilized to evaluate wettability by taking the contact angle. Before testing, the specimens were immersed for 10 minutes each in two disinfection solutions: 16 mg/ml propolis and 5.25% NaOCL. The control group received no disinfection. One-way ANOVA tests and the Kruskal-Wallis test, which was statistically significant at a level of p 0.05, were used to examine the data. Results Comparing the linear dimensional change, surface roughness, and wettability of Addition silicon specimens immersed in 16 mg/ml propolis, 5.25% NaOCL, or the control group demonstrated statistically significant differences (p< 0.05), while details reproduction and compatibility with gypsum revealed statistically no significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusion Within the parameters of this study, the addition silicon can be immersed in 16 mg/ml propolis for 10 min. to disinfect it without compromising its dimensional accuracy, detail reproduction, compatibility with gypsum products, surface roughness, or wettability.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of propolis on the mechanophysical properties of addition silicon dental impression material

Abdulaali,

Abass

2024

F1000Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, a sizable fraction of the bacteria would survive. In light of the recent advice, disinfection solutions are encouraged [10]. Different perspectives on the optimal disinfection process lead it to be challenged to make a well-informed decision [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2023

J. Med. Chem. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disinfection Procedures and Their Effect on the Microorganism Colonization of Dental Impression Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dental impressions are contaminated with potentially pathogenic microorganisms when they come into contact with patient blood, saliva, and plaque. Numerous disinfectants are used; however, no sole disinfectant can be designated as universal for all the impression materials. Thus, the aim of this study is to systemically review the literature to evaluate the effect of the existing disinfection procedures on the bacterial colonization of dental impression materials. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE, and SciELO databases were screened up to April 2021. Eligibility criteria included in vitro studies reporting the antibacterial activity of disinfectant solutions in dental impression materials. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.3.5). A global comparison was performed with the standardized mean difference based on random-effect models at a significance level of α = 0.05. A total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies described the effect of disinfection processes with chlorhexidine gluconate, alcohol, sodium hypochlorite, glutaraldehyde, and hydrogen peroxide in alginate, polyvinyl siloxane, and polyether impression materials. The meta-analyses showed that the use of chlorhexidine, alcohol, glutaraldehyde, and sodium hypochlorite reduced the colony-forming units by a milliliter (CFU/mL) in alginate (p < 0.001). On the other hand, glutaraldehyde, sodium hypochlorite, and alcohol reduced the CFU/mL in polyvinyl siloxane (p < 0.001). Finally, alcohol and glutaraldehyde reduced the CFU/mL in polyether material (p < 0.001). High heterogenicity was observed for the alginate and polyvinyl siloxane materials (I2 = 74%; I2 = 90%). Based on these in vitro studies, the disinfection of impression materials with several disinfection agents reduces the CFU/mL count.

show abstract

General Dentists’ Knowledge About Infection Control of Dental Impressions Between Clinic and Laboratory in South Khorasan Province

Cited by 3 publications

References 12 publications

Effect of propolis on the mechanophysical properties of addition silicon dental impression material

Effect of propolis on the mechanophysical properties of addition silicon dental impression material

Untitled

Disinfection Procedures and Their Effect on the Microorganism Colonization of Dental Impression Materials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About