2020
DOI: 10.3390/v12010058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infection with Foamy Virus in Wild Ruminants—Evidence for a New Virus Reservoir?

Abstract: Foamy viruses (FVs) are widely distributed and infect many animal species including non-human primates, horses, cattle, and cats. Several reports also suggest that other species can be FV hosts. Since most of such studies involved livestock or companion animals, we aimed to test blood samples from wild ruminants for the presence of FV-specific antibodies and, subsequently, genetic material. Out of 269 serum samples tested by ELISA with the bovine foamy virus (BFV) Gag and Bet antigens, 23 sera showed increased… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously observed ( 3 ), we also confirmed the stronger correlation between the reactivities to Gag and Bet than Gag and Env, however, both antigens reacted with clearly lower number of sera than the Gag antigen. Similar results were noted previously not only for FFVfca but also for other FVs ( 9 , 23 ) and can be explained by the cessation of production of Bet protein after the productive phase of FVs infection and its diminution in the persistent one lessening its diagnostic value ( 33 ). The assay using the Env antigen was primarily developed in order to find an alternative to serotype-specific PCR and neutralisation assays ( 3 , 377, 41 ) for distinguishing between FFVfca serotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As previously observed ( 3 ), we also confirmed the stronger correlation between the reactivities to Gag and Bet than Gag and Env, however, both antigens reacted with clearly lower number of sera than the Gag antigen. Similar results were noted previously not only for FFVfca but also for other FVs ( 9 , 23 ) and can be explained by the cessation of production of Bet protein after the productive phase of FVs infection and its diminution in the persistent one lessening its diagnostic value ( 33 ). The assay using the Env antigen was primarily developed in order to find an alternative to serotype-specific PCR and neutralisation assays ( 3 , 377, 41 ) for distinguishing between FFVfca serotypes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The difficulty in isolating retroviral genetic material from wild ruminants was also observed by Materniak et al, who were able to amplify proviral DNA of Foamy virus (FV) in only one out of 269 tested samples (0.37%), although the presence of specific antibodies was detected in 30% of bison and 7.5% of the deer sera. The authors successfully obtained pol and LTR fragments but failed to amplify the gag fragment [ 37 ]. PCR is less sensitive than serological tests and depends mainly on the specificity of the designed primers and the heterogeneity of the viral genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%