2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111266108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of seed bank parameters in two wild tomato species using ecological and genetic data

Abstract: Seed and egg dormancy is a prevalent life-history trait in plants and invertebrates whose storage effect buffers against environmental variability, modulates species extinction in fragmented habitats, and increases genetic variation. Experimental evidence for reliable differences in dormancy over evolutionary scales (e.g., differences in seed banks between sister species) is scarce because complex ecological experiments in the field are needed to measure them. To cope with these difficulties, we developed an a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would allow investigating demographic scenarios and estimating the parameters of these scenarios (bottleneck intensity, ancestral population size, migration rates) using Markovian model implemented in tools such as IM * program (Hey and Nielsen 2004) or ABC 1 methodology (Beaumont, Zhang et al 2002;Lopes and Beaumont 2010). Very recently, this approach has been implemented to infer past demography and ecological parameters of two tomato wild relatives, S. chilense and S. peruvianum (Tellier, Laurent et al 2011). …”
Section: Tomato Domestication In South Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would allow investigating demographic scenarios and estimating the parameters of these scenarios (bottleneck intensity, ancestral population size, migration rates) using Markovian model implemented in tools such as IM * program (Hey and Nielsen 2004) or ABC 1 methodology (Beaumont, Zhang et al 2002;Lopes and Beaumont 2010). Very recently, this approach has been implemented to infer past demography and ecological parameters of two tomato wild relatives, S. chilense and S. peruvianum (Tellier, Laurent et al 2011). …”
Section: Tomato Domestication In South Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice this means that the spatial structure of populations and seed bank effects on demography and selection are difficult to disentangle [6]. Nevertheless, Tellier et al [37] could use this rescaled seed bank coalescent model [26] and Approximate Bayesian Computation to infer the germination rate in two wild tomato species Solanum chilense and S. peruvianum from polymorphism data [38]. A second class of models assumes a strong seed bank effect, whereby the time seeds can spend in the bank is very long, that is longer than the population coalescent time [18], or the time for two lineages to coalesce can be unbounded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In effect, the model of [26] represents a special case, also called a weak seed bank, where the time for lineages to coalesce is finite because the maximum time that seeds can spend in the bank is bounded. In the following we mainly have the weak seed bank model in mind where the time in the seed bank is bounded to a small finite number assumed to be realistic for most plant species [13,24,38,39]. Even if we allow for unbounded times a seed may be stored within the soil, we assume that the germination probability decreases rapidly with age such that e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Kingman coalescent applied to a metapopulation suggests that the genealogy is divided into a short scattering phase and a long collecting phase (Wakeley & Aliacar 2001), while the rates of coalescence in these phases depend on the deme size and level of gene flow between demes. Using different sampling strategies, it is possible to take into account the genealogies of these phases and to study neutral and selective processes acting at the local (scattering phase) and the whole species (collecting phase) level (Städler et al 2009;Tellier et al 2011).…”
Section: Neutral Mechanism: Spatial Structure With Extinction/recolonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Watterson 1984;Kaj & Krone 2003), single panmictic population (e.g. Wakeley & Aliacar 2001;Charlesworth et al 2003), and non-overlapping generations (Tellier et al 2011). Modifications of the Kingman coalescent are obtained by using time-rescaling argument to accommodate variable rates of coalescence in time (Kaj & Krone 2003).…”
Section: The Kingman Coalescent: Assumptions Extensions and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%