1989
DOI: 10.1029/jd094id06p08435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inference of stratospheric aerosol composition and size distribution from SAGE II satellite measurements

Abstract: In this paper the authors present a method that can be used to infer stratospheric aerosol composition and size distribution, based on the water vapor concentration and aerosol extinction measurements from the satellite instrument of the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE II) and the associated temperatures provided by the National Meteorological Center (NMC). To infer the chemical composition, the aerosols are assumed to be sulfuric acid‐water droplets. The equilibrium acid weight percentage and r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the number size distribution parameters there are less values to compare and larger differences between the data sets. In number density, the uncertainties reported by Bingen et al (2004b) are larger than the OE error estimates, whereas those estimated by Wang et al (1989) are considerably smaller. The 11% reported by Wang et al (1989), however, account only for particles greater than 0.15 µm although the great majority of the retrieved OE sizes are smaller than that (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the number size distribution parameters there are less values to compare and larger differences between the data sets. In number density, the uncertainties reported by Bingen et al (2004b) are larger than the OE error estimates, whereas those estimated by Wang et al (1989) are considerably smaller. The 11% reported by Wang et al (1989), however, account only for particles greater than 0.15 µm although the great majority of the retrieved OE sizes are smaller than that (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…8). Similarly, uncertainties in median particle radius estimated by Wang et al (1989) are smaller than those reported by Bingen et al (2004b) and smaller than those achieved through Optimal Estimation, but their error estimates apply only to radii between 0.1 and 0.7 µm. However, although particles smaller than 0.1 µm may contribute little to the total aerosol extinction, their contribution is important to get accurate estimates of the retrieved aerosol properties (Sect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ångström, 1929;Wang et al, 1989;Bingen et al, 2004). In this paper, we show that the same retrieval technique Bourassa et al (2007) apply at 750 nm can be applied to the limb radiance profile at 1530 nm that is measured by one of the channels of the InfraRed Imaging (IRI) module of OSIRIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Heintzenberg et al [1981] calculated the ratio of the cross sections at different wavelengths as a function of particle radius to determine the region in which useful information could be obtained. This criterion sets effective upper and lower limits in particle radius of 1.0 and 0.1 /am for size discrimination from measurements made by SAGE II [Wang et al, 1989]. A third problem arises from the sensitivity of optical extinction to the moments of the size distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%