2023
DOI: 10.21037/atm-23-1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferior vena cava thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma: perioperative systemic therapy, cytoreductive nephrectomy, and complex cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are several articles demonstrating that an abdominal approach to the supradiaphragmatic vena cava is feasible, there are several important drawbacks to this approach (such as the need for Pringle maneuver on the hepatic pedicle, possible damage to the posterior wall of the inferior vena cava, uncontrolled bleeding), patients with a friable thrombus tip may be at risk of intraoperative embolization. 9 , 11 , 12 Although the complications of a CBP bypass are not neglectable, we consider that these cases should be performed under CBP bypass with or without DHCA in order to minimize the risk of intraoperative tumor thrombus embolization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are several articles demonstrating that an abdominal approach to the supradiaphragmatic vena cava is feasible, there are several important drawbacks to this approach (such as the need for Pringle maneuver on the hepatic pedicle, possible damage to the posterior wall of the inferior vena cava, uncontrolled bleeding), patients with a friable thrombus tip may be at risk of intraoperative embolization. 9 , 11 , 12 Although the complications of a CBP bypass are not neglectable, we consider that these cases should be performed under CBP bypass with or without DHCA in order to minimize the risk of intraoperative tumor thrombus embolization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although modern systemic treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors has considerably improved survival for metastatic RCC, the usage of these drugs in an adjuvant setting after radical treatments is controversial and is not reimbursed in most of the European countries. 1 , 12 Several trials, such as Keynote 564 (NCT03142334) or Checkmate 914 (NCT03138512), are now being conducted to evaluate these drugs in the adjuvant context for non-metastatic patients who are at high risk of recurrence, such as those with IVC tumor thrombus. 35 , 36 In our cohort, only six patients received adjuvant treatment with targeted therapy, and the impact of these treatments on the overall survival could not be assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoadjuvant SABR to RCC IVC-TT is also currently under investigation in an open clinical trial (NCT02473536) [64]. Margulis et al reported the viability of this strategy in the safety lead-in stage of the above phase II trial with six patients who received SABR to the IVC-TT (40 Gy in 5 fractions) followed by radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy.…”
Section: Neoadjuvant Sabr For Rcc With Ivc-ttmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus is found in 10% of patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) ( 1 ). The presence of an IVC tumor thrombus poses a number of important considerations during nephrectomy ( 2 ). Foremost amongst these is the potential for embolization of the tumor thrombus during the operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%