2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-014-0938-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Aftershock Sequence Properties and Tectonic Structure Using Empirical Signal Detectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EMFP can, in principle, be applied to single 3-compoenent sensors Seismicity on the Arctic Plate Boundary 15 with the covariance matrices evaluated between the different components, although the performance is likely to be significantly poorer at low SNR (Harris 1990). Empirical signal detectors have been used to great effect at classifying tectonic activity near Svalbard (Junek et al 2015) and EMFP has been demonstrated to provide a significantly improved detection and location capability for seismicity in a geothermal field (Wang et al 2015). However, the performance of such fully empirical classification of seismicity will improve significantly with improvement in the underlying catalog basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMFP can, in principle, be applied to single 3-compoenent sensors Seismicity on the Arctic Plate Boundary 15 with the covariance matrices evaluated between the different components, although the performance is likely to be significantly poorer at low SNR (Harris 1990). Empirical signal detectors have been used to great effect at classifying tectonic activity near Svalbard (Junek et al 2015) and EMFP has been demonstrated to provide a significantly improved detection and location capability for seismicity in a geothermal field (Wang et al 2015). However, the performance of such fully empirical classification of seismicity will improve significantly with improvement in the underlying catalog basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another outstanding technique for the detection of weak teleseismic events is the phase-matched filter [22] popularized by [23,24] in the early 1990s. These pattern matching techniques are a type of Empirical Signal Detector that work by comparing incoming seismic waveforms to canonical examples in the extant seismic record [25,26]. They are particularly effective for the detection of highly correlated repeating events, even for very weak magnitudes [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another outstanding technique for the detection of weak teleseismic events is the correlation detector first introduced by [12] and [13] in the early 1990s. Correlation Detectors are a type of Empirical Signal Detector, that work by comparing incoming seismic waveforms to canonical examples in the extant seismic record [14] [15]. This technique is particularly effective for the detection of highly correlated repeating events, even for very weak magnitudes [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%