2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring fractal dimension of rough/porous surfaces—A comparison of SEM image analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an increase in fractal dimension indicates an increase in the roughness of the surface, whereas a decrease in fractal dimension indicates smoothing of the surface. The fractal dimension of fractals can be determined with different methods, including small-angle X-ray scattering, scanning electron microscope (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, mercury porosimetry, small-angle neutron scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and gas adsorption [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Gas adsorption can be the simplest and most convenient method that is widely used to analyze the pore structure and fractal characterization of objects [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an increase in fractal dimension indicates an increase in the roughness of the surface, whereas a decrease in fractal dimension indicates smoothing of the surface. The fractal dimension of fractals can be determined with different methods, including small-angle X-ray scattering, scanning electron microscope (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, mercury porosimetry, small-angle neutron scattering, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and gas adsorption [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Gas adsorption can be the simplest and most convenient method that is widely used to analyze the pore structure and fractal characterization of objects [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The power-law dependence of the CPE impedance suggests a possible relationship between CPE behavior and the fractal interface geometry of the electrode (Hernandez Creus et al, 1993;Le Mehaute & Crepy, 1983;Nyikos & Pajkossy, 1985;Sapoval et al, 1933). Numerous experimental studies on various materials using different characterization techniques were performed to reveal the structure of solid aggregates by means of fractal dimension (Risović et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2009). In some, though not all, systems studied so far, a relation (Nyikos & Pajkossy, 1985):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated the fractal nature of pore networks in many different rock types using neutron scattering (KAHLE et al, 2004;RADLINSKI, 2006;RADLINSKI et al, 2004) and image analysis (DATHE et al, 2001;LEE et al, 2006;RISOVIC et al, 2008). However, only a handful of studies have shown changes to the fractal distribution of pore networks as a result of chemical or physical properties, such as oil generation (RADLINSKI et al, 2000a;RADLINSKI et al, 1996), metamorphism (ANOVITZ et al, 2009) and chemical weathering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%