Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '93 1993
DOI: 10.1145/169059.169528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring graphical constraints with Rockit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only one constraint per widget side is supported. Finally, Rockit [9] automatically infers constraints from static drawings, using hard-coded rules and heuristics. These approaches require the user to edit or handle individual constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one constraint per widget side is supported. Finally, Rockit [9] automatically infers constraints from static drawings, using hard-coded rules and heuristics. These approaches require the user to edit or handle individual constraints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has dealt with merging rule-based techniques into direct manipulation systems [6] [7]. Constraintbased search and replace is a direct manipulation technique for defining rules that govern the geometry and placement of graphical objects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marks or symbols layered on top of the interface are used for feedback indicating graphical constraints in Briar [6] and Rockit [9]. In Rockit, the marks kept the user informed of the current inference of the system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%