2006
DOI: 10.1007/11814771_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Network Invariants Automatically

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of auxiliary variables by this transformation results in a significant improvement in the number of required clauses with respect to the current stateof-the-art in translating DFA identification to SAT [12] and [13]. Our transformation only requires O(k 2 |V |) clauses for a DFA identification problem, where k is the size of the sought DFA and V are the states of the APTA constructed from the input sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The use of auxiliary variables by this transformation results in a significant improvement in the number of required clauses with respect to the current stateof-the-art in translating DFA identification to SAT [12] and [13]. Our transformation only requires O(k 2 |V |) clauses for a DFA identification problem, where k is the size of the sought DFA and V are the states of the APTA constructed from the input sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This encoding is identical to the CSP-based translation given in [13], and can be considered as the current state-of-the-art in translations of DFA identification to SAT. Notice that the size of the direct encoding is O(|C| 2 |V | 2 ).…”
Section: Direct Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent work on parameterized verification includes [11,7]. The former paper [11] proposes a method to find network invariants using finite automata learning algorithms due to Angluin and Beirmann.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%