2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24668-8_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring Queue Sizes in Access Networks by Active Measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies of broadband [14,32,33] used measurement tools that required cooperation from the remote broadband hosts. Such a methodology restricts the scale of the measurement study.…”
Section: Measurement Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies of broadband [14,32,33] used measurement tools that required cooperation from the remote broadband hosts. Such a methodology restricts the scale of the measurement study.…”
Section: Measurement Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claypool et al [14] performed a measurement study of access networks' queue sizes using 47 volunteering broadband hosts. They found that the median queue size was 350 ms in DSL networks and 150 ms in cable networks, and they showed in simulation that large queue sizes are detrimental to network traffic from interactive applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Claypool et al used 47 broadband hosts to study the broadband access queue sizes [15]. Lakshminarayanan et al measured the TCP throughput and latency from 25 broadband hosts to other hosts [24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As consumer broadband links vary widely around the world we settled on emulating 1Mbps links with drop-tail queues of 60000 bytes in each direction (based on previously published estimations of buffering in consumer routers [21,22]). The drop-tail queues create the bottleneck shared by all traffic traversing the router, and RT T /2 of delay is added in each direction using dummynet [23].…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%