Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470400531.eorms0403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite Horizon Problems

Abstract: The systems under consideration in (discrete‐time) sequential decision problems in operations research and the management sciences often do not have a predetermined time of extinction. Incorporating an arbitrary finite horizon can therefore introduce end‐of‐study distortions in early decisions. Such problems are therefore typically modeled over an unbounded horizon. A majority of the work in this area focuses on stationary models, which assume that the problem data do not change over time. There is also a cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We solve the infinite-dimensional ALP using a so-called finite-horizon approximation, where the weights are timedependent within a chosen time horizon and are stationary afterward. The use of such finite-horizon approximations for infinite-dimensional linear programming problems is wellestablished in the literature (Chand et al, 2002;Ghate, 2010;Grinold, 1977), and we note that this approximation is similar to the finite-horizon approximations in the analysis of infinite-horizon discounted stochastic dynamic programming problems. In both settings, the key to the analysis is the vanishing difference in value functions when the horizon length is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Production and Operations Managementmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We solve the infinite-dimensional ALP using a so-called finite-horizon approximation, where the weights are timedependent within a chosen time horizon and are stationary afterward. The use of such finite-horizon approximations for infinite-dimensional linear programming problems is wellestablished in the literature (Chand et al, 2002;Ghate, 2010;Grinold, 1977), and we note that this approximation is similar to the finite-horizon approximations in the analysis of infinite-horizon discounted stochastic dynamic programming problems. In both settings, the key to the analysis is the vanishing difference in value functions when the horizon length is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Production and Operations Managementmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although our results hold for an arbitrary sequence satisfying our assumptions, our policy requires explicit knowledge of only the first few values of the sequence (two in the model as currently stated, but see Corollary 1 below for an extension). For a discussion of related issues with non-stationary data in infinite-horizon optimization, see, for example, Ghate (2010).…”
Section: Model Formulation and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a finite data set that incorporates time dependent data associated with a long finite horizon still introduces a challenging forecasting and computational task, which realistically can only reliably deliver a limited finite horizon look ahead into the future. One can then attempt a planning horizon approach by solving a sequence of ever longer horizon problems in an attempt to approximate the next best decision that one must implement now [2,4,5,14]. These successive finite horizon problems are typically solved as dynamic programs [1,3,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%