1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01085016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite zero-sum two-person games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since π A 1 , π A 2 ∈ P(A) and α ∈ (0, 1) are arbitrary, then (22) implies that the worst-loss functionĉ ♯ is convex on P(A). Statement (a) is proved.…”
Section: Remark 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since π A 1 , π A 2 ∈ P(A) and α ∈ (0, 1) are arbitrary, then (22) implies that the worst-loss functionĉ ♯ is convex on P(A). Statement (a) is proved.…”
Section: Remark 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the game {A, B, c} satisfies the conditions of Theorem 18 and v = 0. Example 2 admits the following interpretation in the form of a simple game of timing (see Yanovskaya [22,Section 6]) with noncompact decision sets. Two teams work on a project consisting of two independent tasks, each performed by one of the teams.…”
Section: The Existence Of a Lopsided Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theorem and Corollary 3.4 also describe the properties of the solution sets under these conditions. In general, an infinite game may not have a value; see Yanovskaya (1974, p. 527) and the references to counterexamples by Ville, by Wald, and by Sion and Wolfe cited there. Therefore, some additional conditions for the existence of a value and solutions are needed.…”
Section: Main Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two players select nonnegative numbers a and b, and Player I pays the amount of c(a, b) = 𝜑(a − b) to Player II. For example, if the player, who selects the larger number wins, that is, 𝜑(a − b) = I(a > b), this game does not have a value; see for example, Yanovskaya (1974). We apply the results of our article to such games.…”
Section: Number Guessing Gamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these assumptions, we show that the minmax and maxmin values of the linearized game in Equation ( 4) are equal to each other. Such results are known as minimax theorems and have been studied in the past [24,25,26]. However, unlike past works that rely on fixed point theorems, we rely on a constructive learning-style proof to prove the minimax theorem, where we present an algorithm which outputs an approximate NE of the statistical game.…”
Section: Minimax Estimation and Statistical Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%