1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0176-2680(98)00028-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence and the discretionary allocation of several prizes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, competitors may be offered several prices simultaneously. Riis (1996 and1998) show that in a multiple prize and symmetric players setting, the amount of rent seeking is reduced compared to a situation where there is a unique price. Finally, the value of the prize clubs are competing for may itself be endogenous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, competitors may be offered several prices simultaneously. Riis (1996 and1998) show that in a multiple prize and symmetric players setting, the amount of rent seeking is reduced compared to a situation where there is a unique price. Finally, the value of the prize clubs are competing for may itself be endogenous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But their criticism holds only when the process perceived is one where the announcement of outlays by the players is simultaneous while the distribution of prizes is sequential (like the distribution of quotas by the government, or the promotion of several workers. See Clark and Riis [3]). …”
Section:  Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, it is generally observed in the contest literature that pooling competition generates higher dissipation rates (Clark and Riis, 1998;Amegashie, 2000;Moldovanu and Sela, 2006). 2 Clark and Riis (1998) show that the income maximizing contest administrator obtains the highest rent-seeking effort when, instead of many small prizes, a large prize is provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%