1985
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90380-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of adsorbed sulfur on surface diffusion of potassium on nickel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, the measurement for Εa was not successful. In this case relation (2) gives ΕaS/Ni = 4.82 eV.…”
Section: K-s/nimentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, the measurement for Εa was not successful. In this case relation (2) gives ΕaS/Ni = 4.82 eV.…”
Section: K-s/nimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This effect generally is the result of the relatively high work function φ of some single planes of nickel, particularly {111} and {100} (from 5.2 to 5.56 eV and 5.1 to 5.22 eV, respectively [15]) with respect to the ionization potential of potassium I = 4.34 eV. At the beginning of the adsorption the adsorbate could be accumulated on these planes under the diffusion equilibrium conditions [2,16]. In the rough approximation the results are in agreement with the relation The obtained value of Εa+iNi = 2.5 eV is close to other results concerning the activation energy for desorption of potassium, e.g.…”
Section: K/nimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This work is a complement of experimental studies of the surface diffusion which were carried out for small potassium doses corresponding to ÓK = 0.02 on clean nickel [1]. The present result concerns the surface diffusion of higher potassium doses giving the average coverage Θ K = 1.5 on clean nickel , and it was obtained by using the field emission microscopy (FEM) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%