Influence of agricultural amendments on arsenic biogeochemistry and phytotoxicity in a soil polluted by the destruction of arsenic-containing shells

Battaglia-Brunet, Fabienne; Guédard, Marina Le; Faure, Olivier; Charron, Mickaël; Hubé, Daniel; Devau, Nicolas; Joulian, Catherine; Thouin, Hugues; Hellal, Jennifer

doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124580

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, arsenic compounds such as roxarsone are commonly used as feed additives in livestock farming and enter the soil through livestock manure [ 57 , 58 ]. In addition, several studies found As in phosphate and compound fertilizers [ 59 , 60 ]. Using these feeds and fertilizers increases total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and arsenic contents in the soil.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying the Local Influencing Factors of Arsenic Concentration in Suburban Soil: A Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression Approach

Zhu,

Liu,

Jin

et al. 2024

Toxics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploring the local influencing factors and sources of soil arsenic (As) is crucial for reducing As pollution, protecting soil ecology, and ensuring human health. Based on geographically weighted regression (GWR), multiscale GWR (MGWR) considers the different influence ranges of explanatory variables and thus adopts an adaptative bandwidth. It is an effective model in many fields but has not been used in exploring local influencing factors and sources of As. Therefore, using 200 samples collected from the northeastern black soil zone of China, this study examined the effectiveness of MGWR, revealed the spatial non-stationary relationship between As and environmental variables, and determined the local impact factors and pollution sources of As. The results showed that 49% of the samples had arsenic content exceeding the background value, and these samples were mainly distributed in the central and southern parts of the region. MGWR outperformed GWR with the adaptative bandwidth, with a lower Moran’s I of residuals and a higher R2 (0.559). The MGWR model revealed the spatially heterogeneous relationship between As and explanatory variables. Specifically, the road density and total nitrogen, clay, and silt contents were the primary or secondary influencing factors at most points. The distance from an industrial enterprise was the secondary influencing factor at only a few points. The main pollution sources of As were thus inferred as traffic and fertilizer, and industrial emissions were also included in the southern region. These findings highlight the importance of considering adaptative bandwidths for independent variables and demonstrate the effectiveness of MGWR in exploring local sources of soil pollutants.

show abstract