2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of austenitic orientation on martensitic transformations in a compressed high manganese steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This combination of properties is a result of the transformation of retained austenite to martensite during straining, which is referred to as the TRIP effect. The ability of the retained austenite to transform during deformation is affected by many factors, such as (i) the local carbon content of the austenite (van Dijk et al, 2005;Blondé et al, 2012); (ii) the grain size of the retained austenite (Jimenez-Melero et al, 2007); (iii) its morphology (Xiong et al, 2013); (iv) the constraining effect of the phases surrounding the austenite (Timokhina et al, 2004;Jacques et al, 2001); and (v) its crystallographic orientation (Blondé et al, 2012;Kruijver et al, 2003;Muransky et al, 2008;Hilkhuijsen et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2011;Hilkhuijsen, 2013). The influence of austenite orientation on transformation stability is generally attributed to an orientation-dependent mechanical driving force (Hilkhuijsen et al, 2013;Creuziger & Foecke, 2010;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This combination of properties is a result of the transformation of retained austenite to martensite during straining, which is referred to as the TRIP effect. The ability of the retained austenite to transform during deformation is affected by many factors, such as (i) the local carbon content of the austenite (van Dijk et al, 2005;Blondé et al, 2012); (ii) the grain size of the retained austenite (Jimenez-Melero et al, 2007); (iii) its morphology (Xiong et al, 2013); (iv) the constraining effect of the phases surrounding the austenite (Timokhina et al, 2004;Jacques et al, 2001); and (v) its crystallographic orientation (Blondé et al, 2012;Kruijver et al, 2003;Muransky et al, 2008;Hilkhuijsen et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2011;Hilkhuijsen, 2013). The influence of austenite orientation on transformation stability is generally attributed to an orientation-dependent mechanical driving force (Hilkhuijsen et al, 2013;Creuziger & Foecke, 2010;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2), as rapid solidification may reduce intergrain microsegregation inducing simultaneous extended solid solubility. 44,45 Nevertheless, an increasing roughness and density of small droplets are apparent at the surface with increasing Mn concentration. In addition, the neutron diffraction patterns exhibit a broad peak at around 2 ≈ 20° that is associated with a diffuse scattering feature from reflections of the (1½0) planes 47,48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the orientation can be considered as the extrinsic factor governing the austenite stability. The dependence of austenite stability on the orientation can be observed during the plastic deformation, where a certain orientation for martensitic transformation is favored [ 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 ]. The austenite grains with the preferred orientation transform earlier owing to higher resolved shear stress [ 123 ].…”
Section: The Factors Govern Austenite Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%