To evaluate the influence of barbed suture oversew of the transverse staple line during functional end-to-end stapled anastomosis (FEESA) in dogs. Study design: Randomized, experimental, ex vivo.Animals or sample population: Grossly normal jejunal segments from 14 adult canine cadavers.Methods: Ninety-eight jejunal segments (n = 14/FEESA group, n = 14 controls) were harvested and randomly assigned to a control group, FEESA + monofilament suture oversew, FEESA + unidirectional barbed suture oversew or FEESA + bidirectional barbed suture oversew. Oversew techniques were performed using a Cushing suture pattern. Initial (ILP) and maximum leakage pressure (MLP), repair time (s), and location of observed leakage were recorded.Results: No differences were detected in ILP (p = .439) or MLP (p = .644) respectively between experimental groups. Repairs times using barbed suture were 18% faster (25 s faster; p < .001) compared to monofilament suture.There was no difference between barbed suture types (p = .697). Mean ILP (p < .001) and MLP (p < .0001) were 6.6x and 5.1x greater respectively in the control group. Leakage location occurred predominately at the crotch of the FEESA in all groups. Conclusion: FEESAs closed with a transverse staple line oversew using barbed suture, regardless of barb orientation, were completed faster and resulted in similar resistance to anastomotic leakage compared to monofilament suture. Clinical significance: Oversewing the transverse staple line following FEESA using barbed suture offers similar resistance to anastomotic leakage, and may