2008
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.48.793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Bottom Tuyere Configuration on Bath Stirring in a Top and Bottom Combined Blown Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental testing methods were the same as that of a paper by Lai et al The study was performed with 1:6 scaled model of a 30 t converter. The temperature effects were not considered since the impact of the temperature on the dynamic pressure of the jets is relatively small .…”
Section: Physical Model Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental testing methods were the same as that of a paper by Lai et al The study was performed with 1:6 scaled model of a 30 t converter. The temperature effects were not considered since the impact of the temperature on the dynamic pressure of the jets is relatively small .…”
Section: Physical Model Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high mixing efficiency in the converter is largely attributed to stirring effects of the bottom injected gas. Therefore, the effects of various bottom nozzles conditions, [16][17][18][19]24,80,83) gas flow rates and gas supply schemes, 21,22,25,48,140) and combination schemed of top gas and bottom gas 20,26,27,30,78,79,119,141) are studied to optimize the mixing effects in the converter. The velocity distribution inside a 335-ton converter bath as well as the velocity and bubble size distribution in a six plugs 190-ton bottom blown converter with standard bottom stirring are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Stirring and Mixing Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…K. Nakanishi et al 9) investigated the mixing rate of molten steel and mass transfer rate between slag and metal in Q-BOP through water model experiments. Extensive studies were also carried out on the stirring behavior andbehavior mixing characteristics in top blown, [10][11][12][13][14][15] bottom blown, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22] as well as combined blown [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] converter at different stages 30) during a heat using water models. However, the transport phenomena in steel bath are so complex that many phenomena cannot be presented by water model experiments such as the compressibility of high speed oxygen, the interaction behavior between different phases, high temperature performance, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stirring effect of bottom gas on converter bath can be enhanced by optimizing the bottom tuyere number and their arrangement positions and bottom gas intensity 3, 4, but it is difficult to further decrease bath mixing time by optimizing the bottom purging process after the mixing time is lowered to a certain extent. Furthermore, converter lining life can be greatly increased by slag splashing process, but the process would result in raise‐up of converter bottom and all the bottom tuyere ends are covered with a layer of slag, which lowers the stirring effect of bottom gas injected through these tuyeres 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%