1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0255-2701(99)00024-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of coalescence behaviour of the liquid and of gas sparging on hydrodynamics and bubble characteristics in a bubble column

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

25
210
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(240 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
25
210
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the transition from the homogeneous regime is a gradual process. Similar results have been reported in the literature (Camarasa et al, 1999;Schumpe and Grund, 1986). Whereas the large bubble contribution increases with U G , the small bubble rise velocity after an initial decrease remains constant at approximately 0.1-0.15 m/s.…”
Section: Bubble Samplingsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This indicates that the transition from the homogeneous regime is a gradual process. Similar results have been reported in the literature (Camarasa et al, 1999;Schumpe and Grund, 1986). Whereas the large bubble contribution increases with U G , the small bubble rise velocity after an initial decrease remains constant at approximately 0.1-0.15 m/s.…”
Section: Bubble Samplingsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Beyond the regime transition, the holdup of the "non-coalescence-induced" bubble increases only slightly, and so the augmentation of the total holdup is mainly due to the increase in the holdup of fast-rising "coalescence-induced" bubbles. It should be noted that if holdup values measured by the bed expansion and the GD technique are in good agreement, the rise velocities of large bubbles obtained by GD are overestimated compared with terminal rising velocities of "coalescence-induced" bubbles because of the presence of internal liquid circulation (Camarasa et al, 1999;Deshpande et al, 1995). Our results agree with the findings of Schumpe and Grund (1986), (2014,2015).…”
Section: Bubble Samplingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…gravity, surface tension) on flow by adding or removing them at will. An increasing number of papers deal with CFD application to bubble columns [1,7]. Vial et al [22] cite the most important reasons for this increasing interest.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all these processes, gas holdup and bubble size distribution are important design parameters, since they can be used to define the gas-liquid interfacial area available for mass transfer. In turn, these parameters depend strongly on the operating conditions, the physico-chemical properties of the two phases, the gas sparger type and the column geometry [1,2]. Depending on the gas flow rate, two main flow regimes can be readily observed in bubble columns, namely the homogeneous bubbly flow regime, which is encountered at relatively low gas velocities and the heterogeneous 2 of 16 (churn-turbulent flow) regime, which is observed for higher gas velocities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the oil and gas industry, they have gained interest only in the 90s because of the "foamy oil phenomenon" that causes higher production rates than expected for unconventional oil reservoirs, as this phenomenon could be explained by the particular viscosity behavior of foamy fluids. In practice, conventional bubbly flows have been extensively studied since the 70s, in the presence or in the absence of tensioactive agents in the liquid phase (see, e.g., Camarasa et al, 1999). Conventional bubbly flows cover the situation where a gas phase is dispersed in forms of bubbles of various shapes (spherical, ellipsoidal but also spherical caps, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%