2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of construction method on the load bearing capacity of skew masonry arches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, the influence of these two construction methods on the behaviour and strength of the skew masonry arches are analysed under point and line load effects. The results of the analysis improve upon the findings of the recent study [14] and provide a deeper understanding of 3D structural behaviour of single and multi-ring skew masonry arches. It important to note that skew masonry arches reveal complex cracking mechanism and 3D flexural deflections that may be better simulated via discrete element approach.…”
Section: Skew Archessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In this research, the influence of these two construction methods on the behaviour and strength of the skew masonry arches are analysed under point and line load effects. The results of the analysis improve upon the findings of the recent study [14] and provide a deeper understanding of 3D structural behaviour of single and multi-ring skew masonry arches. It important to note that skew masonry arches reveal complex cracking mechanism and 3D flexural deflections that may be better simulated via discrete element approach.…”
Section: Skew Archessupporting
confidence: 76%
“…(2018) investigated the bearing capacity of a 14th century arch bridge in Lecco (Italy) by using a nonlinear finite element model including spring supports. Galassi et al. (2018) presented experimental and numerical investigations on the vulnerability of masonry voussoir arches when subjected to horizontal and vertical support settlements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this need in mind, in recent years, different calculation methods and guidelines (e.g., UIC guideline) 1 for the evaluation of the ultimate (ULS) and serviceability limit states (SLS) of masonry bridges have been developed. Among the available methods for the structural analysis of masonry bridges, it is possible to find: simplified methods (Zhang et al, 2018), numerical method for assess the seismic capacity (Pelà et al, 2013;Zampieri et al, 2014Zampieri et al, , 2015aSarhosis et al, 2016;Mahmoudi Moazam et al, 2018;Marefat et al, 2019), methods based on the limit analysis (Basilio et al, 2014;Chiozzi et al, 2017;Bertolesi et al, 2018), analysis strategies able to take into account the settlement of the supports (Galassi et al, 2018a,b;Zampieri et al, 2018aZampieri et al, ,b, 2019 or geometry uncertainties (Cavalagli et al, 2017), macro-element models (Cannizzaro et al, 2018;D'Altri et al, 2019), and methods based on finite element modeling (FEM) (Brencich and Sabia, 2008;Costa et al, 2016;Scozzese et al, 2019), discrete element modeling (DEM) (Sarhosis et al, 2016(Sarhosis et al, , 2019Forgács et al, 2017Forgács et al, , 2018Stockdale et al, 2019) or a combination of both (Milani and Lourenço, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%