1996
DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00111-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of constructional details on the load carrying capacity of beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to previous research [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the influence of the cope increases with increasing depth to span ratio. Therefore, most calculations were carried out on relatively stocky beams.…”
Section: Parameter Fieldmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to previous research [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the influence of the cope increases with increasing depth to span ratio. Therefore, most calculations were carried out on relatively stocky beams.…”
Section: Parameter Fieldmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The ultimate buckling resistance is obtained by multiplication of the crosssectional capacity with the buckling factor, Eq. (8). For the sections considered, this crosssectional capacity is equal to the plastic moment resistance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End connections such as partial end plates (Lindner, 1985) and coped ends (Yura and Cheng, 1985;Lindner, 1994) can influence the LTB resistance substantially. The influence of end copes should be considered when the depth of a cope is greater than or equal to 0.2d , where d is the total depth of the cross section.…”
Section: Influence Of Partial End Plates and Coped Ends On Lateral-tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…du Plessis [2], Cheng and Yura [9], and Lindner [10][11][12][13][14] carried out full-scale tests on coped beams for determination of the buckling resistance. These tests were carried out with connections to main beams as applied in practice, resulting in partial restraints to rotation about the weak and strong axes of the beam supports.…”
Section: Differences With Other Research Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%