2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of cortical bone thickness on miniscrew microcrack formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are characterized by greater primary stability and a better BIC (bone implant contact); their insertion causes the creation of numerous bone fragments between the coils that can be interpreted as evidence that the bone is not compressed, but etched [ 28 ]. The miniscrews analyzed do not require predrilling, so they are under greater mechanical stress during the insertion [ 22 , 29 ]. Pre- and post-insertion morphostructural assessment performed with stereomicroscope and SEM showed no modification for all the miniscrews tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are characterized by greater primary stability and a better BIC (bone implant contact); their insertion causes the creation of numerous bone fragments between the coils that can be interpreted as evidence that the bone is not compressed, but etched [ 28 ]. The miniscrews analyzed do not require predrilling, so they are under greater mechanical stress during the insertion [ 22 , 29 ]. Pre- and post-insertion morphostructural assessment performed with stereomicroscope and SEM showed no modification for all the miniscrews tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, excessive insertion torque, heat at the border between the screw and the bone, and mechanical damage have been suggested to cause bone degeneration at the implant–tissue interface [ 21 ]. Nguyen et al stated that the ideal penetration torque range of 5–10 Ncm endorsed in the literature seems to be feasible only when the thickness of the cortical bone is between 0.5 and 1.0 mm [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods of imaging have been used previously to assess microdamage on the cortical bone surface. Some of the commonly used modalities are dental radiography, fluorescence imaging (Yadav et al, 2012), and histological studies (Nguyen et al, 2017). In studying microdamage, we need to bear in mind that the microcracks present in the cortical bone are a 3D entity and need to be studied as such.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Oct and μCt Images To Visualize Bone Microdamagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in these papers, the diameter was determined with characteristics such as the Periotest value or the insertion torque, which are related to the screw’s stability and not related to the minimization of risk factors related to screw loosening (e.g., magnitude of microdamage). Furthermore, reproducibility in the experiments and extrapolation to clinics might be questionable because rodent or swine models were utilized [ 12 , 13 , 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%