2002
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225x-31.2.361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Cotton Microhabitat on Temperature and Survival ofTrichogramma(Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) within Cardboard Capsules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in cotton was located within the plant canopy sheltered from ambient winds and high temperatures. Before full canopy closure, the middle section of cotton plants provides a relatively cool humid environment for Trichogramma activity (Suh et al , 2002). This effect disappears late in the season after canopy closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in cotton was located within the plant canopy sheltered from ambient winds and high temperatures. Before full canopy closure, the middle section of cotton plants provides a relatively cool humid environment for Trichogramma activity (Suh et al , 2002). This effect disappears late in the season after canopy closure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, laboratory bioassays are generally conducted in an environment that is benign to the biocontrol agent, with the goal of achieving low levels of mortality in the control treatment. In nature, however, even an agroecosystem that is free of pesticide residues may still be relatively hostile to a biological control agent if it is devoid of key food resources (reviewed in Jervis et al 1993;Heimpel et al 1997), occupied by higher-order predators (Rosenheim 1998), or presents harsh abiotic conditions (Suh et al 2002). These factors could, in theory, reduce survivorship in the absence of pesticide residues to levels that approach those seen in the presence of the pesticide residue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asynchronous development alone does not explain, in terms of density dependence, cases of Trichogramma inoculation that achieve high parasitism levels concurrent with high pest abundance that ultimately result in limited control and unacceptable crop damage (Twine andLloyd 1982, Losey et al 1995). Adult Trichogramma survival, reproductive potential and searching ability, and the development of immatures can be limited by environmental constraints such as chemical applications (Varma and Singh 1987;Navarajan-Paul and Agarwal 1989;Campbell et al 1991;Scholz 1994;Consoli et al 1998;Hassan et al 1998;Scholz et al 1998;Brunner et al 2001;Consoli et al 2001;Takada et al 2001;Vieira et al 2001) and unsuitable climatic conditions (Gross 1988, Grille and Basso 1995, Orr et al 1997, Suh et al 2002 or habitat characteristics (Romeis et al 1999a,b), despite the presence of large numbers of hosts. Host abundance itself may not be the sole driving force behind the dynamics of a natural enemy population, but rather a reßection of the interaction between the attributes of individuals within that population and the characteristics of the environment (Walter and Hengeveld 2000).…”
Section: Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%