Influence of Crystallite Size on the Magnetic Properties of Acicular γ-Fe2O3 Particles

Abstract

Magnetic properties have been measured for a number of samples of acicular γ-Fe2O3 particles of the type used in magnetic recording tapes. The average particle size and shape were approximately the same for all samples. However, the average crystallite sizes of the samples, as determined from x-ray line broadening, ranged from 50 to 700 Å. All magnetic properties measured showed a strong dependence on average crystallite size. Saturation magnetization at room temperature, σ, decreased sharply with decreasing crystallite size. An excellent fit to the σ vs crystallite size data was made by assuming that the crystallites were separated by a nonmagnetic grain boundary on the order of 6 Å wide. Room-temperature coercive force decreased with decreasing crystallite size, and the ratio Hc(83°K)/Hc(293°K) increased sharply with decreasing crystallite size. The data support a particle model in which the constituent crystallites interact magnetostatically across nonmagnetic grain boundaries. A critical crystallite diameter of order 400 Å may be inferred. Below this crystallite size, superparamagnetic behavior is observed; above this size, noncoherent magnetization reversals in the crystallites are suggested. This model is quite consistent with the ``fanning'' mode of reversal based on a ``chain-of-spheres'' model which has been considered by several authors to be most compatible with their data on γ-Fe2O3 particle assemblies.

Maghemite Functionalization for Antitumor Drug Vehiculization

“…The saturation magnetization reaches the values of 30.7 emu/g for bare maghemite nanoparticles at 50 kOe. This value is much lower than that of bulk maghemite, for which published data are about 74 emu/g (Berkowitz et al, 1968). Other values reported in the literature are 52 emu/g in case of particles with size of 15 nm and 31 emu/g for the ones of 7 nm (Millan et al, 2007).…”

Evolution of catalyst particle size during carbon single walled nanotube growth and its effect on the tube characteristics

“…The M s value for pure bulk Fe is ϳ220 emu/ g. It is established that the oxide layers can be present as nonmagnetic shell, 20 superparamagnetic due to very fine grain size, 21 ferromagnetic with a noticeable M s of 45 emu/ g, 22 or as ferromagnetic with 80 emu/ g ͑M s of bulk Fe oxide͒. Therefore, the magnetic contribution from the oxide surface layers around the particle can vary from 0 to 80 emu/ g. Hence, the observed values of M s can be attributed to the presence of an iron oxide shell on the pure Fe core, with different thicknesses ͑different fractions of iron oxide͒ depending on the particle size, which is consistent with particle preparation method ͑calcinations under flowing air͒.…”

Structural and Magnetic Features of Mn1-xZnxFe2O4Nanoparticles

“…The magnetic resonance study of assemblies of nanoparticles is interesting because the magnetic properties of the surface atoms dier radically from the corresponding bulk atoms. It is also known that surface spins resist from being aligned with even a large external magnetic eld [11], which gave rise to the conception of spin canting [12]. As it is well known, the magnetic response of the nanoparticle system to the external eld depends on the cation distribution [13], temperature, and size [14].…”