2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of data sampling methods on the representation of neural spiking activity in vivo

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous study also showed that cerebellar nuclei neurons recorded in the same mouse had equal parameter variability as nuclei neurons recorded in different mice. Therefore, we treated all single nuclei neuron recordings as independent datapoints (79).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our previous study also showed that cerebellar nuclei neurons recorded in the same mouse had equal parameter variability as nuclei neurons recorded in different mice. Therefore, we treated all single nuclei neuron recordings as independent datapoints (79).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously showed that recording duration influences the estimation of neural firing parameters (79). Therefore, all parameter estimates in this paper are based on 30 seconds (s)-long recordings.…”
Section: Spike Sorting and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using these criteria, we have consistently been able to target the cerebellar nuclei [ 75 ]. Only traces with clearly identifiable complex spikes were included for Purkinje cells and, for all cells, only those with sufficiently long and stable recording times (113 ± 7 s average; minimum = 40 s) with an optimal signal-to-noise ratio were included [ 76 ]. The distribution of cells recorded from each genotype in each condition is described in the figure legends.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%