2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of deposition temperature on ZnS thin film performance with chemical bath deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broad diffractions peaks represent the nano‐crystallinity of the films rather than the deposition of amorphous material, as reported previously by several authors . The average crystallite size in the case of ZnS deposition was 9.09 nm and is close to that observed by Man and Lee .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Broad diffractions peaks represent the nano‐crystallinity of the films rather than the deposition of amorphous material, as reported previously by several authors . The average crystallite size in the case of ZnS deposition was 9.09 nm and is close to that observed by Man and Lee .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The effect of different complexing agents has also been explored [32,41]. Recent reports discuss the effect of different deposition variables on structural and optical properties of ZnS thin films obtained from CBD [42][43][44][45]. Despite considerable efforts to understand the precise control of the crystal phase, degree of crystallinity, stoichiometric composition and morphology, there remains a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical band gap can be calculated by extrapolating the straight linear portion of the plots between (αhʋ) 2 and hʋ to the energy axis. The optical bang gap of ZnS thin film was about 3.7 eV, as shown in Figure (b), this value are reported by the literature for ZnS thin films (Zhou et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%