2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150202.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of diabetes mellitus on patient and graft survival in recipients of kidney transplantation

Abstract: Patient survival, but not graft survival, was adversely affected by both pre-existing diabetes and by PTDM, particularly in those with an age less than 55 yr.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
7

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
109
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study the corresponding 5-year survival rates were: 80 vs 85% for transplanted patients and 18 vs 30% for dialysis patients. Two other studies also report poorer patient survival rates but similar graft survival rates in transplanted diabetic patients [19,20], whereas other studies have found a similar survival rate in diabetic and non-diabetic patients for up to 5 years after transplantation [21][22][23]. Nevertheless, receiving a renal transplantation was the strongest predictor of survival rate in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, with a 73% lower mortality risk in transplanted patients compared with patients treated with dialysis, even when correcting for age, sex, calendar time and presence of diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the present study the corresponding 5-year survival rates were: 80 vs 85% for transplanted patients and 18 vs 30% for dialysis patients. Two other studies also report poorer patient survival rates but similar graft survival rates in transplanted diabetic patients [19,20], whereas other studies have found a similar survival rate in diabetic and non-diabetic patients for up to 5 years after transplantation [21][22][23]. Nevertheless, receiving a renal transplantation was the strongest predictor of survival rate in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, with a 73% lower mortality risk in transplanted patients compared with patients treated with dialysis, even when correcting for age, sex, calendar time and presence of diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The proportion of RTR-PD patients surviving with a functioning graft was numerically higher for belatacept versus cyclosporine at 1 year, particularly for the LI regimen, whereas similar composite patient/graft survival was observed in the belatacept and cyclosporine arms in the overall ITT population (16,17). Retrospective studies involving RTR-PD show 1-year patient and graft-survival rates in the approximate range of 85% to 95% (5,6,20) and 80% to 90% (4 -6), respectively. In this study, the 1-year patient survival rates were at the higher end of the range previously reported (5,6,20), and 1-year survival rates were slightly higher for belatacept LI-treated patients compared with cyclosporine-treated patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,29 Thus, most programs offer organs to patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), patients with diabetes, older patients (up to a point), and black patients, despite clear evidence that post-transplantation survival is diminished in each of these groups. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] On ethical grounds alone, there is no justification for providing organs to these groups of patients but not to patients infected with HIV.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%