2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of diet and dietary nanoparticles on gut dysbiosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of nanomaterials in food on gut bacteria have drawn considerable attention. 3 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 The interaction between nanoparticles and bacteria in the colon may result in viability changes, and consequently, alter relative compositions of bacterial species. Since gut bacteria play a critical role in maintaining human health, 113 nanoparticles in food could result in adverse health effects through changes in the gut microbiota.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of nanomaterials in food on gut bacteria have drawn considerable attention. 3 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 The interaction between nanoparticles and bacteria in the colon may result in viability changes, and consequently, alter relative compositions of bacterial species. Since gut bacteria play a critical role in maintaining human health, 113 nanoparticles in food could result in adverse health effects through changes in the gut microbiota.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fecal microbes including Bacteroides such as Alistipes , Prevotella , Firmicutes such as Clostridium, Parvimonas , Peptostreptococcus , Roseburia , and Oscillibacter , Proteobacteria such as Campylobacter , Escherichia , Halomonas , and Shewanella , Verrucomicrobia, Fusobacteria, and Actinobacteria constitute the dysbiosis-associated microbial signatures for CRC. It is interesting to note that Fusobacterium , Parvimonas , Gemella , and Leptotrichia are early bacterial markers for CRC, whereas, β-proteobacteria is a late-stage CRC marker. Proteins such as human neutrophil peptides, S100 proteins, hemoglobin, haptoglobin, AAT, lactoferrin, CEA, exopeptidases (dipeptidyl peptidases I and IV), cadherin-17, selenium binding protein 1, tumor pyruvate kinase type M2, and MMP-9 are biomarkers of the stool . The list of proteomic, genomic, and microbial biomarkers is shown in Table .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that Fusobacterium , Parvimonas , Gemella , and Leptotrichia are early bacterial markers for CRC, whereas, β-proteobacteria is a late-stage CRC marker. 57 59 Proteins such as human neutrophil peptides, S100 proteins, hemoglobin, haptoglobin, AAT, lactoferrin, CEA, exopeptidases (dipeptidyl peptidases I and IV), cadherin-17, selenium binding protein 1, tumor pyruvate kinase type M2, and MMP-9 are biomarkers of the stool. 60 The list of proteomic, genomic, and microbial biomarkers is shown in Table 1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interactions can arise from passive exposure such as through cosmetic products or food. Although NPs will likely first interact with epithelial and mucosal barriers, in some cases they are able to cross these barriers or potentially cause adverse effects, for example by interacting with the natural gut microbiome [14].…”
Section: General Introduction: the Need For Studying Nanoparticle-immune System Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%