2016
DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of dietary slow‐release urea on growth performance, organ development and serum biochemical parameters of mutton sheep

Abstract: Eighty Dorper × thin-tailed Han cross-bred non-castrated male lambs [mean body weight (BW), 25.87 ± 1.06 kg] were randomly allocated to one of five different concentrations of slow-release urea (urea phosphate, UP). The feed consisted of an equal amount of concentrate diet and roughage; the concentrate feed was formulated to be isoenergetic and isonitrogenic and contained 0%, 1%, 2%, 4% and 8% UP (UP0.0, UP1.0, UP2.0, UP4.0 and UP8.0, respectively) as a replacement for soya bean meal. Feed intake, BW, average … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in DMI, ADG and feed-to-weight ratio were not significant in the Angus steers diets supplemented with 1.3% and 3.1% of the Optigen II (Alltech, Lexington, KY) compared to the group supplemented with 1.2% of conventional urea, but ADG and feed utilization efficiency were higher in the PCU group than in the conventional urea group [16]. It has also been shown that under isoenergetic and isonitrogenous conditions, DMI, ADG and feed utilization efficiency were higher among all groups than in the control group when urea phosphate was added at no more than 4% to the concentrate supplement, which is consistent with the results of previous studies; however, when urea phosphate was added at 8% to the concentrate supplement, DMI, ADG and feed utilization efficiency of beef cattle were significantly lower than in the control group [17]. In this trial, polymer-coated urea and gelatinized starch urea were added at 2% and 2.5%, respectively, in this trial.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fungal Community Structure Based On Genus Levelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The differences in DMI, ADG and feed-to-weight ratio were not significant in the Angus steers diets supplemented with 1.3% and 3.1% of the Optigen II (Alltech, Lexington, KY) compared to the group supplemented with 1.2% of conventional urea, but ADG and feed utilization efficiency were higher in the PCU group than in the conventional urea group [16]. It has also been shown that under isoenergetic and isonitrogenous conditions, DMI, ADG and feed utilization efficiency were higher among all groups than in the control group when urea phosphate was added at no more than 4% to the concentrate supplement, which is consistent with the results of previous studies; however, when urea phosphate was added at 8% to the concentrate supplement, DMI, ADG and feed utilization efficiency of beef cattle were significantly lower than in the control group [17]. In this trial, polymer-coated urea and gelatinized starch urea were added at 2% and 2.5%, respectively, in this trial.…”
Section: Analysis Of Fungal Community Structure Based On Genus Levelsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with previous studies, our results found that feeding the urea diet decreased ADG and DM and CP digestibility. The intake and growth performance of lambs were reduced by adding 8% urea to the diet [ 18 ]. Supplementing the urea diet instead of the protein feed to dairy cows also decreased milk yield [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huntington, Harmon, Kristensen, Hanson, & Spears (2006) found that supplementing SRU in diet did not affect the serum urea nitrogen level of cattle. The levels of serum ALP and glucose in sheep were unaffected until the dosage of urea phosphate was higher than 4% in the concentrate feed (Ji et al, 2017). Goulart et al (2013) observed that the concentration of γ-GGT, urea, and ALB were not differed in cows after feeding SRU diet and urea diet.…”
Section: Effect Of Sru On Serum Metabolites Of Beef Cattlementioning
confidence: 97%