The search for suitable alternative for fossil fuel has been a challenge to
the research community for the past two decades. So many alternatives have
been identified and tested. However, a complete replacement cannot be
provided without any penalties of cost, excess emission, poor operation,
etc. The alcohols gave a new opportunity and a solution for the above
problem but had some setbacks of increased density and lower octane number.
The present workfocuses on striking a balance between advantages and
disadvantages by using oxygenated additive with gasoline fuel. The additive
cerium oxide (CeO2) along with methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)offers many
advantages. The seven samples, namely M10, M15, M20, M25, M20+50mg/l,
M20+100mg/l, M20+150 mg/lhave been preparedand tested on Sprk Ignition (SI)
engine. Here, 10, 15, 20,and 25 denote the MTBE volume in blends and 50
mg/l, 100mg/l, and 150mg/l indicate the CeO2 in blends. The results have
shown that only MTBE has caused an increase of 4% in Brake Thermal
Efficiency (BTE)with M15 and then BTE has improved by 3% with M15+100mg/l
compared with pure gasoline. And, fuel consumption has also been reduced
upto 9% with M20 and 11% with M15+150mg/l compared with pure gasoline. The
maximum HC and CO reductions have also been observed from M20 and
M20+150mg/l ; it was up to 19% and 22%, 23% ,and 25% of HC and CO with M20,
M20+ 150mg/l. However, there has been an increase in CO2 emission level
because of excessive unburnt hydrocarbon (HC) reduction. The MTBE with CeO2
has proved to be suited to all running conditions. The blends having more
amounts of additive produce good combustion characteristics yet it should be
restricted within 20 vol% of MTBE and 150mg/l of CeO2.