2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icma.2019.8816640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Different Feature Selection Methods on EMG Pattern Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be accomplished by selecting a feature set that maximally differentiates the intended output classes [1]. The basic building block of organization schemes and crucial towards recognition of gesture commands is the abstraction of particular structures after the EMG data [2]. However, with a block dispensation still model like AR archetypal, it is challenging to extract feature parameters exactly due to the nonstationary of the EMG signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be accomplished by selecting a feature set that maximally differentiates the intended output classes [1]. The basic building block of organization schemes and crucial towards recognition of gesture commands is the abstraction of particular structures after the EMG data [2]. However, with a block dispensation still model like AR archetypal, it is challenging to extract feature parameters exactly due to the nonstationary of the EMG signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olsson et al 21 classified a high number of movements by defining them as combinations of fundamental ones, each recognized by a binary CNN in a multi-label classification. Zhang et al 22 tested Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Sequential Forward Selection (SFS) methods for the feature selection on the EMG SVM classifier. According to Wang et al 23 modeled EMG signal assuming additive noise, the Root Difference of Squares (RDS) represents EMG best and has a Gaussian Distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Turn the screw with stick grasping screwdriver (8)23 Cut something (holding a knife with ''index finger extension'' (4))…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that, with only a decrease of 0.9% in accuracy from 94.0 to 93.1%, they could reduce the number of sensors necessary by 54%. Other meta-heuristics were used in EMG feature selection as well ( Phinyomark and Scheme, 2018 ), such as particle swarm optimization ( Purushothaman and Vikas, 2018 ; Too et al, 2019 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ; Bakiya et al, 2020 ) and ant colony optimization ( Purushothaman and Vikas, 2018 ). Many other meta-heuristics exist which are suited for feature selection in general, such as tabu search and simulated annealing ( Diao and Shen, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%