2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2003.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of different sources of error on estimated kinetics parameters for a second-order reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pharmaceutical industry, driven by the FDA ' s PAT initiative, can be seen as a forerunner. This is refl ected by the observation that many references in this chapter are (co -) authored by representatives from pharmaceutical companies like Glaxo Wellcome 21,29 and GlaxoSmithKline, 8,10,36,39,40 Astra Zeneca, 19,38 Novartis 28 and Eli Lilly. 18 As with other spectroscopic techniques, UV -vis spectroscopy can readily be used in lab -based R & D. The implementation as process monitors, scanning for deviations from the set state, is certainly an added value and low in maintenance requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pharmaceutical industry, driven by the FDA ' s PAT initiative, can be seen as a forerunner. This is refl ected by the observation that many references in this chapter are (co -) authored by representatives from pharmaceutical companies like Glaxo Wellcome 21,29 and GlaxoSmithKline, 8,10,36,39,40 Astra Zeneca, 19,38 Novartis 28 and Eli Lilly. 18 As with other spectroscopic techniques, UV -vis spectroscopy can readily be used in lab -based R & D. The implementation as process monitors, scanning for deviations from the set state, is certainly an added value and low in maintenance requirements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction of kinetic parameters from in -line UV -vis spectroscopy may suffer from three sources of error: namely, instrumental noise, error in determining initial concentrations, and error in the calibration of pure standards, as is pointed out by Carvalho et al 36 These authors have studied the infl uence of these errors on the determined rate constants for a simulated second -order reaction and compared twelve methods to cope with the errors in fi ve groups. They fi nd signifi cant differences in accuracy and precision.…”
Section: Reaction Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigating reactions to obtain kinetic information such as rate constants is a useful and common approach in modern chemistry [1][2]. Therefore, reaction rate methods are becoming increasingly important in analytical chemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Established kinetic (hard) and partial least squares (soft) modeling chemometric methods were applied to both datasets to compare the information acquired with each probe. Carvalho et al [2] also investigated the influence of three sources of error, namely, instrumental noise, error in determining initial concentrations and calibration of pure standards, and the determination of rate constants from the resultant spectra for the second-order reactions. Twelve methods involving a mixture of multivariate and kinetic models for estimating rate constants were compared in five groups (MLR, Rank Augmentation, Difference Spectra, Mixed Spectra and PCR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this calculation systematically underestimates this uncertainty when compared to the one resulting from multiple repetitions of the experiment under the same conditions. Some other contributions to the uncertainty in the rate constants, such as baseline shifts [26,27], spectral constraints in the least squares [28] and preceding calibration procedures [29] have been studied. Also, bootstrapping has been compared to variance-covariance based uncertainty calculations [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%