2004
DOI: 10.1080/09553002310001655449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of DNA double‐strand break rejoining on clonogenic survival and micronucleus yield in human cell lines

Abstract: Fast DSB rejoining, possibly through interaction with slow DSB rejoining, appears to play an important role in the formation of micronuclei. However, total DSB rejoining reflects intrinsic radiosensitivity. Consideration of differences in DSB rejoining kinetics might contribute to a better understanding of the significance of cell survival and micronucleus data in the clinical and radiation protection setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of micronuclei was consistently higher in the MF-exposed cells at all five menadione concentrations used. The micronucleus findings indicate that the enhanced rate of DNA damage removal in the MF-exposed cells did not lead to improved fidelity of DNA repair, consistent with previous findings showing that the rate and fidelity of DNA repair are not necessarily correlated [24], [25]. The findings of the present study actually show an inverse relationship between repair rate and repair fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The level of micronuclei was consistently higher in the MF-exposed cells at all five menadione concentrations used. The micronucleus findings indicate that the enhanced rate of DNA damage removal in the MF-exposed cells did not lead to improved fidelity of DNA repair, consistent with previous findings showing that the rate and fidelity of DNA repair are not necessarily correlated [24], [25]. The findings of the present study actually show an inverse relationship between repair rate and repair fidelity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This observation (fast repair and increased micronuclei in the MF + menadione exposed cells) might reflect a causal relationship, if one assumes that it reflects dominance of the faster, but more error-prone, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) repair pathway over the slower, but more precise, homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway [26]. There is evidence that the fast component of DSB rejoining and micronucleus yield are positively correlated [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 where the cell lines with the least G1 depletion showed less MN yield after neutron irradiation, and is consistent with the suggestion that in cell lines lacking a G1-block, there is a progression of DNA damage through S-phase and this incurs a high level of genomic instability (Paulovich et al, 1997). In another study using the glioblastoma cell lines, we demonstrated that while total (20 hours) DNA double-strand-break (DSB) rejoining reflects clonogenic cell survival, fast (2 hours) rejoining influences MN yield (Akudugu et al, 2004). Mammalian cells repair DNA damage mainly by both homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) (Sargent et al, 1997;Liang et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…where, k is a cell type-dependent constant. D0-values were derived from the slope of a linear regression fit according to Equation (1) for SD ≤ 0.1 and absorbed doses not greater than 10 Gy, using cell survival data for 17 cell lines from three different cancer types [36][37][38] , and were subsequently used to calculate transition doses for comparison with those determined from the LQ formalism.…”
Section: Estimation Of D0 From the Multi-target Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following, data for 17 cancer cell lines spanning a wide range of radiosensitivities [36][37][38] , were used to test whether D0, as originally defined, is indeed independent of the level of cell kill. The implications of a potential dependence of D0 on the extent of cell kill on the strength of the LQ model as a predictor of radiosensitivity at high radiation absorbed doses are further discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%