2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-014-9923-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Drilling Parameters on the Accuracy of Hole-drilling Residual Stress Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…97 , are considerably lower than that of the 6061-T651 aluminium or 304 stainless steel utilised by Ref. 94 , see Figure 4.…”
Section: Drilling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…97 , are considerably lower than that of the 6061-T651 aluminium or 304 stainless steel utilised by Ref. 94 , see Figure 4.…”
Section: Drilling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The manner in which the hole is induced and deviations in the geometry of the hole can influence measured strains [94][95][96][97] . The most common method of inducing the hole is by the use of a high-speed air-turbine 65 , but a number of alternative drilling techniques also exist 65,88,97,98 .…”
Section: Drilling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The key issues in this field have shifted from the study of the apparent problems of quality and performance of remanufacturing products to the deep-seated problems of high quality and reliability assurance. At present, the stress ·2· testing methods [10] can be divided into two categories: destructive methods [11] (small hole method, stripping layer method, ring core method) and nondestructive methods [12][13][14][15][16] (ray diffraction method, magnetic memory method, optical method and ultrasonic method), Although these methods can realize stress measurement, there are some problems which can't be ignored, for example, the destructive methods destroy the integrity of the component structure and can only realize the sampling testing, The X-ray diffraction method is harmful to the health of operator. The optical method has high requirements for the detection environment and can't be detected on-line.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%