2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of egg type, pressure and mode of incorporation on density and bubble distribution of a lady finger batter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following several common particle size distribution parameters based on length were evaluated from these significant dimensions. Uniformity index I us and size guide number N sgs [13,23], relative span RS ms [24], coefficient of uniformity C us and coefficient of gradation C gs [25]; and inclusive graphic skewness GS is , and graphic kurtosis K gs [26,27]; r igs inclusive graphic standard deviation; distribution geometric standard deviation of the high region GSD 1s (between x 84s and x 50s ), distribution geometric standard deviation of the low region GSD 2s (between x 16s and x 50s ) and distribution geometric standard deviation of the total region GSD 12s (between x 84s and x 16s ) [28] were evaluated as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following several common particle size distribution parameters based on length were evaluated from these significant dimensions. Uniformity index I us and size guide number N sgs [13,23], relative span RS ms [24], coefficient of uniformity C us and coefficient of gradation C gs [25]; and inclusive graphic skewness GS is , and graphic kurtosis K gs [26,27]; r igs inclusive graphic standard deviation; distribution geometric standard deviation of the high region GSD 1s (between x 84s and x 50s ), distribution geometric standard deviation of the low region GSD 2s (between x 16s and x 50s ) and distribution geometric standard deviation of the total region GSD 12s (between x 84s and x 16s ) [28] were evaluated as:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Batter density was measured using an Electronic scale (Model NWTH-2K, Yuheng Weighing Equipment Co. Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan), which is a cup that consisted of a 20 ml cylindrical container and a cover with a hole for removing excess of liquid [15]. The cup is initially weight empty for calibration and then after filling with the batter.…”
Section: Batter Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) (Allais et al 2006a, b;Tan et al 2010Tan et al , 2011. The average of five samples was taken from the same batch of cake batter mix with a repeated run.…”
Section: Batter Density and Rheologymentioning
confidence: 99%