Bur-prepared cavities represented less interfacial gap width than laser-prepared cavities. A self-etching adhesive system showed the least interfacial gap compared to etch-and-rinse adhesives and performed similarly in bur-and laser-prepared cavities.
SUMMARYOne of the challenges in durability of posterior tooth-colored restorative materials is polymerization shrinkage, which results in gap formation between the restoration and tooth structure. The aim of the present study was to investigate marginal adaptation of Class II composite restorations using a self-etching and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in cavities prepared either with bur or Er,-Cr:YSGG laser. A total of 45 extracted sound human premolars were selected. In each tooth, mesial and distal Class II cavities were prepared either by a diamond bur or by Er,-Cr:YSGG laser with the margins 1 mm apical to the cemento-enamel junction. Then the teeth were randomly divided into three groups of 15 each, according to the type of the adhesive system used (Single Bond, Single Bond 2, Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee, DDS, MS, associate professor,