2008
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.7010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of evaporation from the forest floor on evapotranspiration from the dry canopy

Abstract: Abstract:Evaporation from the forest floor (Ef ) of a secondary broad-leaved forest was monitored for 1 year at 30 min intervals using a closed chamber system. The diurnal and seasonal variation of Ef and forest structure were analysed for days undisturbed by rainfall. The diurnal change in Ef reached a maximum at about 14 : 00 and gradually decreased towards midnight along with the vapour pressure deficit (D). Although Ef comprised about 20% of evapotranspiration from the dry canopy (Et ), it had only a small… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daikoku et al . () also reported that the seasonal variation in E soil measured by a closed chamber system was related strongly to D more than to available energy above the canopy in a broad‐leaved forest. Contributions of both D and R s to E soil in this study might be associated with the closed canopy of the KEW (LAI = 4.5–5.5), which may cause inhibition of mixing of air beneath the canopy by wind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daikoku et al . () also reported that the seasonal variation in E soil measured by a closed chamber system was related strongly to D more than to available energy above the canopy in a broad‐leaved forest. Contributions of both D and R s to E soil in this study might be associated with the closed canopy of the KEW (LAI = 4.5–5.5), which may cause inhibition of mixing of air beneath the canopy by wind.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest floor evaporation. The E f was measured with three weighing lysimeters placed randomly in the study site (Kelliher et al, 1990;Schaap and Bouten, 1997;Daikoku et al, 2008). The lysimeter was a container of 0.2-m diameter filled with forest soil that was disturbed as little as possible.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess responses of bulk canopy conductance to water to changes in soil water content, we estimate canopy conductance directly from the measured latent heat flux when conditions are suitable. We assume that the bulk canopy stomatal conductance to water vapour (expressed on a ground-area basis) can be estimated from the observed latent heat flux under conditions of a dry canopy surface conditions and negligible evaporation from the soil surface (such conditions are common in a Mediterranean climate; Daikoku et al, 2008). Bulk canopy stomatal conductance to water vapour, G c , was then estimated from the measured moisture flux, using simplified form of the Penman-Monteith equation assuming that stomatal and atmospheric transfer occur in series, as:…”
Section: Interpreting Fluxnet Datamentioning
confidence: 99%